Solid tailings after supercritical CO2 extraction of lignocellulosic biomass as a source of quality biochar for energetic use and as soil improvement

Submitted: 11 January 2022
Accepted: 28 September 2022
Published: 21 June 2023
Abstract Views: 619
PDF: 99
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Lignocellulosic biomass is a rich source of bioactive compounds extracted industrially from different parts of the plant. The extraction process generates residues containing 75 to 95% of the raw material, depending on the species. There is biochar among the many potential products of post-extraction residue’ processing. The research objective was: i) to evaluate the parameters of biochars derived from post-extraction bark, wood and bark and wood of four lignocellulosic species; and ii) to discuss the parameters in the context of biochar functionality as an energy carrier and soil improver. The residues were subjected to pyrolysis at the three temperatures, 170, 270, and 370°C, which correspond to the initiation of carbonisation, and two biochars that differ in the decomposition rates of hemicelluloses, cellulose, and lignin. On average, biochars had a high energy value owing to the increased total and fixed carbon and calorific value content by 77.0-78.4% DM, 64.6- 66.7% DM and 25.8-30.1 MJ kg–1, respectively. The higher quantity of ash after processing bark residues than wood residues implicates a lower energy value but, at the same time, the ash obtained is a better source of mineral compounds in soil fertilisation. Concerning using biochar as a soil improver, the biochars demonstrated lower hydrogen/carbon and oxygen/carbon molar ratios, indicating raised stability and resistance to the geochemical decomposition in soil. It was proven that the bark-based biochars had much higher concentrations of micro- and macronutrients, and a higher pH, while processed wood fractions resulted in higher concentrations of total carbon and fixed carbon in the biochar. The research results suggest that lignocellulose biomass extraction residues can serve as a valuable input material for biochar production.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Al-Wabel M.I., Al-Omran A., El-Naggar A.H., Nadeem M., Usman A.R.A. 2013. Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 131:374-9.
Angin D. 2013. Effect of pyrolysis temperature and heating rate on biochar obtained from pyrolysis of safflower seed press cake. Bioresour. Technol. 128:593-7.
Bai M., Wilske B., Buegger F., Bruun E.W., Bach M., Frede H.G., Breuer L. 2014. Biodegradation measurements confirm the predictive value of the O:C-ratio for biochar recalcitrance. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 177:633-7.
Bergman P.C.A., Kiel J.H.A. 2005. Torrefaction for biomass upgrading. Proceedings of the 14th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Paris, France.
Białowiec A., Pulka J., Stępień P., Manczarski P., Gołaszewski J. 2017. The RDF/SRF torrefaction: an effect of temperature on characterization of the product – carbonized refuse derived fuel. Waste Manag. 70:91-100.
Conti R., Rombolà A.G., Modelli A., Torri C., Fabbri D. 2014. Evaluation of the thermal and environmental stability of switchgrass biochars by Py-GC-MS. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 110:239-47.
De Bhowmick G., Sarmah A.K., Sen R. 2018a. Production and characterization of a value added biochar mix using seaweed, rice husk and pine sawdust: a parametric study. J. Clean. Prod. 200:641-56.
De Bhowmick G., Sarmah A.K., Sen R. 2018b. Lignocellulosic biorefinery as a model for sustainable development of biofuels and value added products. Bioresour. Technol. 247:1144-54.
de Caprariis B., De Filippis P., Hernandez A.D., Petrucci E., Petrullo A., Scarsella M., Turchi, M. 2017. Pyrolysis wastewater treatment by adsorption on biochars produced by poplar biomass. J. Environ. Manage. 197:231-8.
EBC. 2019. Guidelines of the European biochar certificate. Available from: Accessed on: 21 January 2020.
European Commission. 2015. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Closing the loop - an EU action plan for the circular economy. Available from: Accessed: 21 January 2020.
FAO. 2019. FAO soils portal. Available from: Accessed: 21 January 2020.
Fischer D., Glaser B. 2012. Synergisms between compost and biochar for sustainable soil amelioration. In: Kumar S., Bharti A. Management of Organic Waste. IntechOpen, London, UK.
Jining Z., Lü F., Luo C., Shao L., He P. 2014. Humification characterization of biochar and its potential as a composting amendment. J. Environ. Sci. 26:390-7.
Kan T., Strezov V., Evans T.J. 2016. Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: a review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 57:1126-40.
Knowles O.A., Robinson B.H., Contangelo A., Clucas L. 2011. Biochar for the mitigation of nitrate leaching from soil amended with biosolids. Sci. Total Environ. 409:3206-10.
Kopetz H., Jossart J.M., Ragossnig H., Metschina C. 2007. European biomass statistics 2007: a statistical report on the contribution of biomass to the energy system in the EU 27. European Biomass Association, Brussels, Belgium.
Lee Y., Park J., Ryu C., Gang K.S., Yang W., Park Y.K., Jung J., Hyun S. 2013. Comparison of biochar properties from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500°C. Bioresour. Technol. 148:196-201.
Lehmann J., Rillig M.C., Thies J., Masiello C.A., Hockaday W.C., Crowley D. 2011. Biochar effects on soil biota - a review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43:1812-36.
Liu Z., Quek A., Kent Hoekman S., Balasubramanian R. 2013. Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. Fuel. 103:943-9.
Mašek O., Budarin V., Gronnow M., Crombie K., Brownsort P., Fitzpatrick E., Hurst P. 2013. Microwave and slow pyrolysis biochar - comparison of physical and functional properties. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 100:41-8.
Medic D., Darr M., Shah A., Potter B., Zimmerman J. 2012. Effects of torrefaction process parameters on biomass feedstock upgrading. Fuel. 91:147-54.
Mohan D., Sarswat A., Ok Y.S., Pittman C.U. 2014. Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent - a critical review. Bioresour. Technol. 160:191-202.
Mumme J., Srocke F., Heeg K., Werner M. 2014. Use of biochars in anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 164:189-97.
Nelissen V., Saha B.K., Ruysschaert G., Boeckx P. 2014. Effect of different biochar and fertilizer types on N2O and NO emissions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 70:244-55.
Ostolski M., Adamczak, M., Brzozowski B., Wiczkowski W. 2021. Antioxidant activity and chemical characteristics of supercritical CO2 and water extracts from willow and poplar. Molecules. 26:545.
Radawiec W., Dubicki M., Karwowska A., Żelazna K., Gołaszewski J. 2014. Biochar from a digestate as an energy product and soil improver. Agric. Eng. 18:149-56.
Schimmelpfennig S., Glaser B. 2012. One step forward toward characterization: some important material properties to distinguish biochars. J. Environ. Quality. 41:1001-13.
Sigua G.C., Novak J.M., Watts D.W., Cantrell K.B., Shumaker P.D., Szögi A.A., Johnson M.G. 2014. Carbon mineralization in two ultisols amended with different sources and particle sizes of pyrolyzed biochar. Chemosphere. 103:313-21.
Spokas K.A. 2010. Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O:C molar ratios. Carbon Manag. 1:289-303.
Tan Z., Lin C.S.K., Ji X., Rainey T.J. 2017. Returning biochar to fields: a review. Appl. Soil Ecol. 116:1-11.
Tang J., Zhu W., Kookana R., Katayama A., 2013. Characteristics of biochar and its application in remediation of contaminated soil. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 116:653-9.
Troy S.M., Lawlor P.G., O’ Flynn C.J., Healy M.G. 2013. Impact of biochar addition to soil on greenhouse gas emissions following pig manure application. Soil Biol. Biochem. 60:173-81.
Tsai W.T., Liu S.C., Chen H.R., Chang Y.M., Tsai Y.L. 2012. Textural and chemical properties of swine-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use as a soil amendment. Chemosphere. 89:198-203.
van der Stelt M.J.C., Gerhauser H., Kiel J.H.A., Ptasinski K.J. 2011. Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: a review. Biomass Bioener. 35:3748-62.
Weber K., Quicker P. 2018. Properties of biochar. Fuel. 217:240-61.
Zhao B., Connor D.O., Zhang J., Peng T., Shen Z., Tsang D.C.W., Hou D. 2018. Effect of pyrolysis temperature , heating rate , and residence time on rapeseed stem derived biochar. J. Clean. Prod. 174:977-87.
Zheng H., Wang Z., Deng X., Herbert S., Xing B. 2013. Impacts of adding biochar on nitrogen retention and bioavailability in agricultural soil. Geoderma. 206:32-9.

How to Cite

Radawiec, W., Gołaszewski, J. and Kalisz, . B. . (2023) “Solid tailings after supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> extraction of lignocellulosic biomass as a source of quality biochar for energetic use and as soil improvement”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 54(3). doi: 10.4081/jae.2023.1344.