Original Articles Open access

Assessing the effect of barns structures and environmental conditions in dairy cattle farms monitored in Northern Italy

Authors

Published
23 December 2021
Section
Original Articles
DOI
10.4081/jae.2021.1229

Abstract

Animal welfare is a fundamental pillar for livestock farming, and it can be endangered by a series of aspects, among which is the presence of undesired microclimates. This condition can be monitored by measuring the temperature-humidity index (THI), an index able to inform about the emergence of heat-stressing conditions in the barns. The THI can be influenced by the external environmental conditions and the barn structure, orientation, thermal buoyancy, and roof insulating materials. In order to evaluate these structural aspects of buildings and the consequent microclimate, in this study, a survey was carried out in 8 dairy cattle barns located in the northern part of Italy that were monitored continuously during thermoneutral, warm, and cold periods. Experts observed the structural aspects ,and the environmental parameters were measured with sensors. From the results emerged that the barns had structural characteristics that considerably affect the internal microclimate, with openings, roof height, forced ventilation, and building orientation playing a significant role in estimating of the THI in the barn. The more critical period was the warm one when the structures could not mitigate the external conditions, and THI exceeded the threshold of 72 for a big share of the period in all monitored farms (range between 50-80% of observations). In the best situation, the cooling systems were able to maintain the external conditions. The results confirm the importance of the barn design and of an appropriate ventilation to improve air exchanges.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen J.D., Hall L.W., Collier R.J., Smith J.F. 2015. Effect of core body temperature, time of day, and climate conditions on behavioral patterns of lactating dairy cows experiencing mild to moderate heat stress. J. Dairy Sci. 98:118-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7704
  2. Arcidiacono C., Mancino M., Porto S.M.C. 2020. Moving mean-based algorithm for dairy cow’s oestrus detection from uni-axial-accelerometer data acquired in a free-stall barn. Comp. Electron. Agr. 175:105498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105498
  3. ASABE. 2006. Design of ventilation systems for poultry and livestock shelters. pp 652-670 in Standards 2006 American Society of Agri-cultural and Biological Engineers (53rd Edition), St. Joseph, MI, USA.
  4. Bar D., Kaim M., Flamenbaum I., Hanochi B., Toaff-Rosenstein R.L. 2019. Technical note: Accelerometer-based recording of heavy breathing in lactating and dry cows as an automated measure of heat load. J. Dairy Sci. 102:3480-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15186
  5. Bellingeri A., Cabrera V., Gallo A., Liang D., Masoero F. 2019. A survey of dairy cattle management, crop planning, and forages cost of production in Northern Italy. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 18:786-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2019.1580153
  6. Berman A. 2019. An overview of heat stress relief with global warming in perspective. Int. J. Biometeorol. 63:493-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-019-01680-7
  7. Bohmanova J., Misztal I., Cole J.B. 2007. Temperature-humidity indices as indicators of milk production losses due to heat stress. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1947-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-513
  8. CIGR. 2014. The design of dairy co and replacement heifer housing. Report of the CIGR Section II Working Group n. 14 - cattle housing.
  9. Das R., Sailo L., Verma N., Bharti P., Saikia J. 2016. Impact of heat stress on health and performance of dairy animals: a review. Veterinary World 9:260-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.260-268
  10. De Paepe M., Pieters J.G., Cornelis W.M., Gabriels D., Merci B., Demeyer P. 2012. Airflow measurements in and around scale model cattle barns in a wind tunnel: effect of ventilation opening height. Biosyst. Eng. 113:22-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.06.003
  11. Fernández M.E., Mariño R.A., Carreira X.C. 2008. Relationship between layout and timber structures in freestall dairy cattle barns: influence of internal features. Biosyst. Eng. 100:266-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.03.001
  12. Ferraz P.F.P., Ferraz G.A.e.S., Leso L., Klopčič M., Barbari M., Rossi G. 2020. Properties of conventional and alternative bedding materials for dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 103:8661-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18318
  13. Firfiris V.K., Martzopoulou A.G., Kotsopoulos T.A. 2019. Passive cooling systems in livestock buildings towards energy saving: A critical review. Energ. Buildings 202:109368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109368
  14. Halachmi I., Guarino M., Bewley J., Pastell M. 2019. Smart animal agriculture: application of real-time sensors to improve animal well-being and production. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 7:403-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-114851
  15. Hempel S., Menz C., Pinto S., Galán E., Janke D., Estellés F., Müschner-Siemens T., Wang X., Heinicke J., Zhang G., Amon B., del Prado A., Amon T. 2019. Heat stress risk in European dairy cattle husbandry under different climate change scenarios-uncertainties and potential impacts. Earth Syst. Dynam. 10:859-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-859-2019
  16. Honig H., Miron J., Lehrer H., Jackoby S., Zachut M., Zinou A., Portnick Y., Moallem U. 2012. Performance and welfare of high-yielding dairy cows subjected to 5 or 8 cooling sessions daily under hot and humid climate. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3736-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5054
  17. ISTAT. 2021. Italian National Institute of Statistics. Available from: http://dati.istat.it/?lang=en Accessed: 13 Sept. 2021.
  18. Lovarelli D., Bacenetti J., Guarino M. 2020a. A review on dairy cattle farming: Is precision livestock farming the compromise for an environmental, economic and social sustainable production? J. Clean Prod. 262:121409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121409
  19. Lovarelli D., Finzi A., Mattachini G., Riva E. 2020b. A survey of dairy cattle behavior in different barns in Northern Italy. Animals 10:713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040713
  20. Menconi M.E., Grohmann D. 2014. Model integrated of life-cycle costing and dynamic thermal simulation (MILD) to evaluate roof insulation materials for existing livestock buildings. Ener. Buildings 81:48-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.06.005
  21. Pinto S., Hoffmann G., Ammon C., Heuwieser W., Levit H., Halachmi I., Amon T. 2019. Effect of two cooling frequencies on respiration rate in lactating dairy cows under hot and humid climate conditions. Ann. Anim. Sci. 19:821-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2019-0026
  22. Polsky L., von Keyserlingk M.A. 2017. Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. J. Dairy Sci. 100:8645-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12651
  23. Porto S.M.C., D’Emilio A., Cascone G. 2017. On the influence of the alternation of two different cooling systems on dairy cow daily activities. J. Agr. Eng. 48:21-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2017.577
  24. Provolo G., Riva E. 2008. Influence of temperature and humidity on dairy cow behaviour in freestall barns. Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering for a sustainable world: Conference Proceedings, Hersonissos, Greece.
  25. Tassinari P., Bovo M., Benni S., Franzoni S., Poggi M., Mammi L.M.E., Mattoccia S., Di Stefano L., Bonora F., Barbaresi A., Santolini E., Torreggiani D. 2021. A computer vision approach based on deep learning for the detection of dairy cows in free stall barn. Comp. Electron. Agr. 182:106030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106030
  26. Van Iaer E., Tuyttens F.A.M., Ampe B., Sonck B., Moons C.P.H., Vandaele L. 2015. Effect of summer conditions and shade on the production. Animal 9:1547-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000816
  27. Vox G., Maneta A., Schettini E. 2016. Evaluation of the radiometric properties of roofing materials for livestock buildings and their effect on the surface temperature. Biosyst. Eng. 144:26-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.01.016

Metrics

Citations and online attention from Dimensions, Altmetric and PlumX.

PlumX Metrics

License

Copyright (c) 2021 the Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.