Original Articles
28 October 2025

Locomotor activity of dairy cows in new and converted barns

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Locomotor activity contributes to the fitness and physiological stability of dairy cows and is a key indicator of animal welfare. Modern barn design should therefore aim to promote cow movement. A central question is whether such activity-promoting environments require entirely new construction or whether existing barns can be effectively converted to meet current welfare standards. This observational study investigates the structural and technical factors influencing cow activity under practical farming conditions. Data were collected on 18 commercial dairy farms in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, of which six featured converted existing facilities and twelve newly constructed barns between 2018 and 2022. Cow activity was measured using ALT pedometers (Holz, Falkenhagen, Germany) over 56 measurement periods from 2020 to 2022. A total of 633 cows were monitored, yielding 24,202 daily activity records. Activity pulses were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model accounting for repeated measures and hierarchical data structure. The results showed no significant differences in locomotor activity between cows housed in newly built versus converted barns. Similarly, no significant effect was observed for floor type (slatted vs flat). In contrast, pasture access, month of measurement, milking system, parity, and days in milk significantly influenced activity levels. Cows with pasture access displayed the highest activity, and seasonal effects pointed to environmental influences. Two farms exhibited markedly elevated activity: presumably one due to long distances to pasture, the other due to feed presentation via an external hayrack—highlighting the impact of specific management features. Contrary to earlier research, rubber flooring did not significantly affect activity. This may be explained by the widespread use of rubber flooring (on average 80% coverage) across nearly all farms, which reduced variability. Herd size and milk yield also showed no significant effect, likely due to the use of automated feeding systems reducing the need to walk for feed. While causal conclusions are limited by the non-randomized study design, the results suggest that well-executed barn conversions can offer locomotor opportunities equivalent to those of new buildings. This supports the view that modern conversions can be a resource-efficient and welfare-compatible solution for updating dairy housing. The findings provide a valuable evidence base for structural planning and policy development in sustainable dairy farming.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Abeni, F., Galli, A. 2017. Monitoring cow activity and rumination time for an early detection of heat stress in dairy cow. Int. J. Biometeorol. 61:417-425.
Adewuyi, A.A., Roelofs, J.B., Gruys, E., Toussaint, M.J.M., Van Eerdenburg, F.J.C.M. 2006. Relationship of plasma nonesterified fatty acids and walking activity in postpartum dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 89:2977-2979.
Alsaaod, M., Huber, S., Beer, G., Kohler, P., Schüpbach-Regula, G., Steiner, A. 2017. Locomotion characteristics of dairy cows walking on pasture and the effect of artificial flooring systems on locomotion comfort. J. Dairy Sci. 100:8330-8337.
Arnott, G., Ferris, C.P., O’Connell, N.E. 2017. Review: welfare of dairy cows in continuously housed and pasture-based production systems. Animal 11:261-273.
Bendel, J. 2005. [Auswirkungen von elastischen Bodenbelägen auf das Verhalten von Milchrindern im Laufstall].[Inaugural Dissertation in German]. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich.
Benz, B. 2002. [Elastische Beläge für Betonspaltenböden in Liegeboxenlaufställen].[Dissertation in German]. University of Hohenheim.
Benz, B., Kaess, M., Wattendorf-Moser, F., Hubert, S. 2020. Effects of hourly grazing of dairy cows on behaviour and performance on a practical farm. Züchtungskunde 92:159-171.
Benz, B., Eilers, U., Gallmann, E., Merkel, A., Seeger, H.-J. 2024. [Beobachtungen zu Aufenthaltsorten und zum Ausscheidungsverhalten von Kühen auf einem strukturierten Laufhof].[Article in German]. Agricultural engineering 79:116-130.
Blake, J.T., Olsen, J.D., Walters, J.L., Lamb, R.C. 1982. Attaining and measuring physical fitness in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 65:1544-1555.
Bleuler, T. 1981. [Verhaltensaktivitäten von Milchkühen in verschiedenen Haltungssystemen und deren Beziehung zu haltungsbedingten Schäden. Teil I: Verhaltensaktivitäten von Milchkühen in verschiedenen Haltungssystemen].[ in German]. Institute for Animal Production, Animal Physiology and Hygiene, ETH Zurich.
Brade, W. 2001.[ Wichtige Verhaltenscharakteristika des Rindes].[Article in German]. Milchpraxis 39:146-149.
Brzozowska, A., Łukaszewicz, M., Sender, G., Kolasińska, D., Jolanta. O. 2014. Locomotor activity of dairy cows in relation to season and lactation. Appl. Anim Behav Sci. 156:6-11.
Buer, H., Palzer, A., Frohnmayer, S. 2016. [NutztierSkills. Arbeitstechniken in der Großtierpraxis: Rind, Schwein, Schaf, Ziege].[Book in German]. Stuttgart, Schattauer Verlag.
Crump, A., Jenkins, A., Bethell, E., Ferris, C., Arnott, G. 2019. Pasture access affects behavioural indicators of wellbeing in dairy cows. Animals (Basel) 9:902.
Davidson, J.A., Beede, D.K. 2003. A system to access fitness of dairy cows responding to exercise training. J. Dairy Sci. 86:2839-2851.
Davidson, J.A., Beede, D.K. 2009. Exercise training of late-pregnant and non-pregnant dairy cows affects physical fitness and acid-base homeostasis. J. Dairy Sci. 92:548-562.
Dohme-Meier, F., Kaufmann, L.D., Görs, S., Junghans, P., Metges, C.C., van Dorland, H.A., et al. 2014. Comparison of energy expenditure, eating pattern and physical activity of grazing and zero-grazing dairy cows at different time points during lactation. Livest. Sci. 162:86-96.
Estevez, I., Andersen, I.E., Nævdal, E. 2007. Group size, density and social dynamics in farm animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 103:185-204.
Flower, F.C., de Passillé, A.M., Weary, D.M., Sanderson, D.J., Rushen, J. 2007. Softer, higher-friction flooring improves gait of cows with and without sole ulcers J. Dairy Sci. 90:1235-1242.
Fregonesi, J., Tucker, C., Weary, D., Flower, F., Vittie, T. 2004. Effect of rubber flooring in front of the feed bunk on the time budgets of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 87:1203-1207.
Greenough, P. 2007. Bovine laminitis and lameness. A hands-on approach. Edinburgh, Saunders Ltd.
Günther, M. 1991. Claw diseases. Jena, Gustav Fischer Verlag.
Gustafson, G.M. 1993. Effects of daily exercise on the health of tied dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 17:209-223.
Hasenpusch, F., Seidel, A., Hasler, M, Thaller, G. 2023. [Einfluss verschiedener Bodenbeläge auf die Aktivität von Milchkühen].[Article in German]. Züchtungskunde 95:400–411.
Heinicke, J., Hepel, S., Pinto, S., Ammon, Ch., Amon, T., Englisch, A., Hoffmann, G. 2017. Effect of heat stress on behavioural and vitality parameters of dairy cows. Proc. Conf. Construction, Technology and Environment in Farm Animal Husbandry 2017, Stuttgart-Hohenheim. pp. 64-69.
Hut, P.R., Kuiper, S.E.M., Nielen, M., Hulsen, J.H.J.L., Stassen, E.N., Hostens, M.M. 2022. Sensor based time budgets in commercial Dutch dairy herds vary over lactation cycles and within 24 hours. PLoS One 17:e0264392.
Jensen, M.B. 1999. Effects of confinement on rebounds of locomotor behaviour of calves and heifers, and the spatial preferences of calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 62:43-56.
Jungbluth, T., Benz, B., Wandel, H. 2003. Soft walking areas in loose housing systems for dairy cows. Proc. Fifth Conf. International Dairy Housing, Fort Worth. pp. 171-177.
Keil, N.M., Wiederkehr, T.U., Friedli, K., Wechsler, B. 2006. Effects of frequency and duration of outdoor exercise on the prevalence of hock lesions in tied Swiss dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 74:142-153.
Keller, A., Clauss, M., Muggli, E., Nuss, K. 2009. Even-toed but uneven in length: the digits of artiodactyls. Zoology (Jena) 112:270-278.
Kok, A., Ternman, E., Thorup, V. M. (2023). The neglected potential of 24-h pattern analysis in dairy cow behaviour monitoring. J. Dairy Res. 90:252–256.
Krohn, C.C., Munksgaard, L., Jonasen, B. 1992. Behaviour of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing/pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments I. Experimental procedure, facilities, time budgets—diurnal and seasonal conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1992:37–47.
Lamb, R.C., Anderson, M.J., Walters, J.L. 1981. Forced walking prepartum for dairy cows of different ages. J. Dairy Sci. 64:2017-2024.
Lamb, R.C., Barker, B.O., Anderson, M.J., Walters, J.L. 1979. Effects of Forced Exercise on Two-Year-Old Holstein Heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 62:1791-1797.
Legrand, A.L., von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., Weary, D.M., 2009. Preference and usage of pasture versus free-stall housing by lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 92:3651-3658.
Maierl, J., Mülling, C. 2004. Functional anatomy. Diseases of the hooves and toes of cattle. Stuttgart, Schattauer Verlag.
Maselyne, J., Pastell, M., Thomsen, P.T., Thorup, V.M., Hänninen, L., Vangeyte, J., et al. 2017. Daily lying time, motion index and step frequency in dairy cows change throughout lactation. Res. Vet. Sci. 110:1–3.
Mastellone, V., Musco, N., Infascelli, F., Scandurra, A., D'Aniello, B., Pero, M.E., et al. 2022. Higher forage: Concentrate ratio and space availability may favour positive behaviours in dairy cows. J. Vet. Behav. 51:16-22.
Müller, R., Schrader, L. 2005. individual consistency of dairy cow activity in their home pen. J. Dairy Sci. 88:171-175.
Mülling, Ch., Budras, K.-D. 1998. The intercellular cement (Membrane Coating Material, MCM) in the bovine claw. Wiener Tierärztliche Monatsschrift 85:216-223.
Oberschätzl-Kopp, R., Haidn, B., Peis, R., Reiter, K., Bernhardt, H. 2016. Investigations on the behaviour of dairy cows during automatic feeding on an AMS farm. Agricultural Engineering 71:55-65.
Platz, S., Ahrens, F., Bendel J., Meyer, H.H.D., Erhard, M.H. 2008. What happens with cow behaviour when replacing concrete slatted floor by rubber coating: a case study. J. Dairy Sci. 91:999-1004.
Ramón-Moragues, A., Carulla, P., Mínguez, C., Villagrá, A., Estellés, F. 2021. Dairy cows activity under heat stress: a case study in Spain. Animals (Basel) 11:2305.
Schmid, T., Weishaupt, M.A., Meyer, S.W., Waldern N., Von Peinen, K., Nuss, K. 2009. High-speed cinematographic evaluation of claw-ground contact pattern of lactating cows. Vet. J. 181:151-157.
Shepley, E, Lensink, J., Vasseur, E. 2020. Cow in Motion: A review of the impact of housing systems on movement opportunity of dairy cows and implications on locomotor activity. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 230:105026.
Telezhenko, E., Bergsten, C. 2005. Influence of floor type on the locomotion of dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 93:183-197.
Telezhenko, E., Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., Talebi, A., Weary D.M. 2012. Effect of pen size, group size, and stocking density on activity in freestall-housed dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3064-4953.
Wierig, M., Engels, Ch., Müller, U., Büscher, W. 2019. Sensor-based recording of the behavioural patterns of dairy cows in a cubicle housing system. Proc. Conf. Construction, Technology and Environment in Farm Animal Husbandry, Bonn. pp. 100-105.

How to Cite



“Locomotor activity of dairy cows in new and converted barns” (2025) Journal of Agricultural Engineering [Preprint]. doi:10.4081/jae.2025.1706.