Original Articles Open access

Ray-tracing method for fields of view simulation in agricultural and forestry vehicles

Authors

Published
4 March 2025
Section
Original Articles

Abstract

Fatal injuries represent a significant issue in activities involving agricultural machinery. The operator's low visibility is one of the main factors leading to such events. In this paper, a virtual prediction method of the field of view for a tractor is analyzed using a rendering based on the Ray-Tracing algorithm. Its performance is compared with standardized experimental tests based on ISO 5006:2017, presented as the "mirror test" and the "shadows test". This novel method requires the use of a three-dimensional CAD model of the vehicle under investigation, as well as the test surfaces suggested by current standards. The accuracy of the produced simulations is evaluated using several metrics, such as the amplitude, amount, and position of the masking effects. The results show that the proposed method is consistent with physical machine tests, performing better than the mirror test in all cases. Small discrepancies are due to the difficulty in synchronizing the experimental setup with the virtual model. The system accurately estimates masking effects, with an average error of 8.69% when comparing the Ray-Tracing test with the shadows test, and 26.94% with the mirror test. After improvements, the error was reduced to 6.45%.

References

  1. Autodesk Inc. 2024. Autodesk Inventor – Computer-aided design software. Version 2024. San Rafael, Autodesk Publ. Available from: https://www.autodesk.com/products/inventor/overview
  2. Bostelman, R., Teizer, J., Ray, S., Agronin, M., Albanese, D. 2013. Methods for improving visibility measurement standards of powered industrial vehicles. Safety Sci. 62:257-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.020
  3. CEN 2022. Tractors and agricultural machines – Visibility of self – propelled machinery – Part 2: Specific requirements and test of self - propelled machinery. CEN/TC 144-2. European Committee for Standardization, Publ., Brussels, Belgium.
  4. Gilad, I., Bayran, E., 2015. Quantifying driver's field-of-view in tractors: methodology and case study. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 21:20-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1017942
  5. INAIL, 2021. Available from: https://www.inail.it/cs/internet/comunicazione/news-ed-eventi/news/news-dati-inail-agricoltura-2021.html#:~:text=Nel%20quinquennio%202015%2D2019%20ha,%2C9%25%20degli%20infortuni%20accertati
  6. INFOR.MO. 2021 Available from: https://www.inail.it/cs/internet/attivita/ricerca-e-tecnologia/area-salute-sul-lavoro/sistemi-di-sorveglianza-e-supporto-al-servizio-sanitario-naziona/informo.html
  7. ISO, 1998. Earth-moving machinery, and tractors and machinery for agriculture and forestry — Seat index point. Norm EN ISO 5353:1998. International Organization for Standardization Publ., Geneva, Switzerland.
  8. ISO, 2013. Agricultural tractors — Requirements, test procedures and acceptance criteria for the operator's field of vision. Part 1: Field of vision to the front. Norm ISO 5721-1:2013. International Organization for Standardization Publ., Geneva, Switzerland.
  9. ISO, 2014. Agricultural tractors — Requirements, test procedures and acceptance criteria for the operator's field of vision. Part 2: Field of vision to the side and to the rear. Norm ISO 5721-2:2014. International Organization for Standardization Publ., Geneva, Switzerland.
  10. ISO 2017. Earth moving machinery – Operator’s field of view – Test method and performance criteria. Norm ISO 5006:2017. International Organization for Standardization Publ., Geneva, Switzerland.
  11. Zvěřina, L., Cibulka, M., Staněk, L., Ulrich R. 2022. Analysis of field view from tractor and trailer units using the method of terrestrial laser scanning. Forests (Basel) 13:1383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091383

Metrics

Citations and online attention from Dimensions, Altmetric and PlumX.