https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2024.1576
Drag reduction design and experiments for the chisel-shaped shovel tip
Published: 16 April 2024
Abstract Views: 36
PDF: 22
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
To address the issue of high resistance encountered by traditional chisel-shaped shovel tips during tillage, this study drew inspiration from the micro V-shaped structures found in shark skin. Using laser cladding technology, a V-shaped wear-resistant coating was applied to the front surface of the shovel, with different drag-reducing V-shaped structures achieved by controlling the coating overlap ratio H (including 20%, 40%, and 60%). Additionally, the rear surface of the shovel tip was designed to mimic the V-shaped morphology of shark skin, proportionally amplified, and given a certain backward tilt angle θ to further reduce resistance. Through the discrete element simulation experiments while maintaining θ at 0°, it was found that the shovel tip achieved the best drag reduction effect when H was 40%. Based on this, the study varied the values of θ (including 0°, 1°, 3°, and 5°) while keeping H at 40%. Discrete element simulation experiments were conducted at depths of 250mm, 275mm, and 300mm to analyze the disturbance effect, fragmentation effect, and resistance of the shovel tip. Considering all factors, the shovel tip with θ of 5° was selected as the optimal choice. Finally, a soil trench experiment was conducted to verify the performance of the V-shaped shovel tip with H of 40% and θ of 5°, as well as the chisel-shaped shovel tip, in tillage operations. The experimental results showed good agreement with the simulation results, and the designed V-shaped shovel tip achieved a maximum drag reduction of 12.87%. This design provides valuable references for the structural optimization of subsoiler, contributing to the improvement of their performance and efficiency.
Zheng K., D. McHugh A., Li H.W., Wang Q.J., Lu C.Y., Hu H.N., Liu W.Z., Zhang Z.Q, Liu P., He J. 2019. Design and experiment of anti-vibrating and anti-wrapping rotary components for subsoiler cum rotary tiller. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 12:47-55.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20191204.4369
Torres J.L.R., Leal Júnior A.L.B., Barreto A.C., Carvalho F.J., de Assis R.L., Loss A., Lemes E.M., Da Silva Vieira D.M. 2022. Mechanical and Biological Soil Decompaction for No-Tillage Maize Production. Agronomy-Basel. 12:2310.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102310
Martins M.B., Marques Filho A.C., Santana L.S., Guimarães Júnnyor W.D.S., Bortolheiro F.P.D.A., Vendruscolo E.P., Seron C.D.C., Costa E., Da Silva K.G.P. 2023. Productivity and Quality Sugarcane Broth at Different Soil Management. Agronomy-Basel. 13:170.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010170
Niu J.P., Luo T.Y, Xie J.Q, Cai H.X., Zhou Z.K, Chen J., Zhang S. 2022. Simulation and experimental study on drag reduction and anti-adhesion of subsoiler with bionic surface. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 15:57-64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20221504.6531
Song W., Jiang X.H., Li L.K., Ren L.L., Tong J. 2022. Increasing the width of disturbance of plough pan with bionic inspired subsoilers. Soil Tillage Res. 220:105356.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2022.105356
Zhang L., Zhai Y.B., Chen J.N., Zhang Z.E., Huang S.Z. 2022. Optimization design and performance study of a subsoiler underlying the tea garden subsoiling mechanism based on bionics and EDEM. Soil Tillage Res. 220:105375.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2022.105375
Wu B.G., Zhang R.Z., Hou P.F., Tong J., Zhou D.Y., Yu H.Y., Zhang Q., Zhang J.S, Xin Y.L. 2021. Bionic Nonsmooth Drag Reduction Mathematical Model Construction and Subsoiling Verification. Appl. Bionics Biomech. 2021:1-13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5113453
Jia H.L., Guo M.Z., Zhao J.L., Huang D.Y., Zhuang J., Qi J.T. 2019. Design and test of bionic wide-ridge soybean tilling-sowing machine. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 12:42-51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20191201.4014
Bai J.F., li B., Lv X.T., Chen J., Shi J.T. 2016. Study on Vibration Anti-drag of tje Badger Claws Bionic Subsoiler. J. Agric. Mech. Res. 38:224-227. [Article in Chinese].
Zhang Z.H., Gan S.H., Zuo G.B., Tong J. 2021. Bionic Design and Performance Experiment of Sandfish Head Inspired Subsoiler Tine. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 52:33-42. [Article in Chinese].
Ma F.L., Zeng Z.Z., Gao Y.M., Liu E.Y., Xue Q.J. 2016. Research status and progress of bionic surface drag reduction. Chin. Surf. Eng. 29:7. [Article in Chinese].
Wu L.Y., Jiao Z.B., Song Y.Q., Liu C.H., Wang H., Yan Y.Y. 2018. Experimental investigations on drag-reduction characteristics of bionic surface with water-trapping microstructures of fish scales. Sci Rep. 8:12186–12191.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30490-x
Pu X, Li G, Liu Y. 2016. Progress and perspective of studies on biomimetic shark skin drag reduction. Chem Bio Eng Reviews. 3:26–40.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201500011
ZHANG D.Y., LUO Y.H., LI X., CHEN H.W. 2011. NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF DRAG-REDUCING SURFACE OF A REAL SHARK SKIN. J. Hydrodyn. 23:204-211.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60105-9
Wen L., Weaver J.C., Lauder G.V. 2014. Biomimetic shark skin: design, fabrication and hydrodynamic function. J. Exp. Biol. 217(10):1656-1666.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.097097
Sun J.Y., Wang Y.M., Ma Y.H., Tong J., Zhang Z.J. 2018. DEM simulation of bionic subsoilers (tillage depth >40 cm) with drag reduction and lower soil disturbance characteristics. Adv. Eng. Softw. 119:30-37.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.02.001
Wang X.Z. 2021. Soil-Winged Subsoiler Interactions and Their Effects. Northwest A&F University.
Hu H.B., Song B.W., Pan G., Mao Z.Y., Du X.H. 2007. Simulation Studies On Drag Reduction Mechanism of Shark Riblets Surface. J. Syst. Simul. 4901-4903. [Article in Chinese].
Wang Y.M., Li N., Ma Y.H, Tong J., Pfleging W., Sun J. 2020. Field experiments evaluating a biomimetic shark-inspired (BioS) subsoiler for tillage resistance reduction. Soil Tillage Res. 196:104432.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104432
Zhao D.Y., Huang Z.P., Wang M.J., Wang T., Jin Y.F. 2012. Vacuum casting replication of micro-riblets on shark skin for drag-reducing applications. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 212:198-202.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.09.002
Kim T.W. 2014. Assessment of Hydro/Oleophobicity for Shark Skin Replica with Riblets. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 14:7562-7568.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2014.9570
Dean B., Bhushan B. 2010. Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: a review. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 368:4775-4806.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0201
Yan Z.F., Li M.D., Du Z.H., Yang X., Luo Y., Chen X.D., Han B. 2023. Study on a tracked amphibious robot bionic fairing for drag reduction. Ocean Eng. 267.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113223
Agrawal A.K., Chattopadhyaya S., Murthy V.M.S.R., Legutko S., Krolczyk G. 2020. A Novel Method of Laser Coating Process on Worn-Out Cutter Rings of Tunnel Boring Machine for Eco-Friendly Reuse. Symmetry-Basel. 12:471.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12030471
Xu L.F, Song Z.H., Li M.X., Li F., Guo J., Gao M. 2021. Self-Grinding Silage Knife Strengthened with Ni–WC Alloy Prepared by Laser Cladding. Appl. Sci.-Basel. 11:10236.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110236
Shan B., Chen J.L., Chen S.Y., Ma M.Z., Ni L.L., Shang F.M., Zhou L. 2022. Laser cladding of Fe-based corrosion and wear-resistant alloy: Genetic design, microstructure, and properties. Surf. Coat. Technol. 433:128117.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128117
Li M.K., Huang K.P., Yi X.M. 2023. Crack Formation Mechanisms and Control Methods of Laser Cladding Coatings: A Review. Coatings 13:1117.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13061117
Chen H.W., Che D., Zhang X., Yue Y., Zhang D.Y. 2015. Large-proportional shrunken bio-replication of shark skin based on UV-curing shrinkage. J. Micromech. Microeng. 25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/25/1/017002
Wang W.W., Song J.L., Zhou G.A., Quan L.Z., Zhang C.L., Chen L.Q. 2022. Development and Numerical Simulation of a Precision Strip-Hole Layered Fertilization Subsoiler While Sowing Maize. Agriculture-Basel. 12:938.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070938
Li X., Jiang Z.J., Wang S.C., Li X.L., Liu Y., Wang X.H. 2023. A Study of a Model for Predicting Pneumatic Subsoiling Resistance Based on Machine Learning Techniques. Agronomy-Basel. 13:1079.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041079
Zheng K., He J., Li H.W., Diao P.S., Wang Q.J., Zhao H.B. 2016. Research on Polyline Soil-breaking Blade Subsoiler Based on Subsoiling Soil Model Using Discrete Element Method. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 47:9. [Article in Chinese].
Ding Q.S., Ren J., BELAL E.A., Zhao J.K., Ge S.Y., Li Y. 2017. DEM Analysis of Subsoiling Process in Wet Clayey Paddy Soil. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 48:3. [Article in Chinese].
Wang Y., Zhang D., Yang L., Cui T., Jing H., Zhong X. 2020. Modeling the interaction of soil and a vibrating subsoiler using the discrete element method. Comput. Electron. Agric. 174:105518.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105518
Hao Z.H., Zheng E.L., Li X., Yao H.P., Wang X.C., Qian S.Y., Li W.X., Zhu M. 2023. Performance analysis of the soil-contacting parts for no-tillage planters and optimization of blade structure. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 39:2. [Article in Chinese].
Jiang X.H., Tong J., Ma Y.H., Sun J.Y. 2020. Development and verification of a mathematical model for the specific resistance of a curved subsoiler. Biosyst. Eng. 190:107-119.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.12.004
Wang X.Z., Li P., He J.P., Wei, W., Huang Y.X. 2021. Discrete element simulations and experiments of soil-winged subsoiler interaction. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 14:50-62.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20211401.5447
Wang X.Z., Zhang S., Pan H.B., Zheng Z.Q., Huang Y.X., Zhu R.X. 2019. Effect of soil particle size on soil-subsoiler interactions using the discrete element method simulations. Biosyst. Eng. 182:138-150.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.04.005
Vanderhasselt A., Cool S., D Hose T., Cornelis W. 2023. How tine characteristics of subsoilers affect fuel consumption, penetration resistance and potato yield of a sandy loam soil. Soil Tillage Res. 228:105631.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2022.105631
Qin K., Zhao Y., Zhang Y.Z., Cao C.M., Shen Z.G. 2022. Lateral stress and its transmission law caused by operation of a double-wing subsoiler in sandy loam soil. Front. Environ. Sci. 10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.986361
Tong J., Jiang X.H., Wang Y.M., Ma Y.H., Li J.W., Sun J.Y. 2020. Tillage force and disturbance characteristics of different geometric-shaped subsoilers via DEM. Adv. Manuf. 8:392-404.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-020-00318-x
How to Cite
Wang, L., Zheng, C., Li, M., Mi, T., Li, S. and Yi, X. (2024) “Drag reduction design and experiments for the chisel-shaped shovel tip”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering. doi: 10.4081/jae.2024.1576.
Copyright (c) 2024 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.