Development of a transplanter-based transplanter for vegetable seedlings cultured in a cuttable nursery mat

Published: 26 March 2024
Abstract Views: 311
PDF: 132
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Vegetable transplanters that are fully automated have been developed to reduce the labor-intensive and yield-influencing process of transplanting; however, the majority of these transplanters are heavy and costly. Based on a traditional Japanese rice transplanter, we created a low-cost, high-efficiency vegetable transplanter in this study. Because a rice transplanter can only be utilized in flooded fields, certain mechanical parts have been adjusted to allow for the transplantation of rice on dry fields. In order to precisely slice the nursery mat one by one without harming the seedlings, the rotor case and end-effector parts were modified. Additionally, a long guide and a leaf spring-type retainer were created in order to securely hold heavier and larger vegetable seedlings than those of rice, and a cuttable nursery mat (CNM) was introduced as a new kind of solid nursery bed. The prototype could transplant up to 250 cabbage plants min−1 row−1 for planting speed of 1.0 m s−1. Conventional plug seedlings (PS) are not as suitable for transplanting and cultivation as CNM seedlings (CNMS). Unlike PS, CNMS were only cultured for a brief period prior to transplantation since the CNM itself has sufficient stiffness, negating the need for root spread. This study is the first demonstration of the possible applications of this rice transplanter- based vegetable transplanting system.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Agriplant N.V. 2023. Available from:
Agriculture & Livestock Industries Corporation. 2018. Available from: (in Japanese).
Balliu A., Sallaku G., Nasto T. 2017. Nursery management practices influence the quality of vegetable seedlings. Italus Hortus. 24:39-52. DOI:
Bechar A., Vigneault C. 2017. Agricultural robots for field operations. Part 2: Operations and systems. Biosyst. Eng. 153:110-28. DOI:
Botta G.F., Tolon-Becerra A., Lastra-Bravo X., Tourn M. 2010. Tillage and traffic effects (planters and tractors) on soil compaction and soybean (Glycine max L.) yields in Argentinean pampas. Soil Till. Res. 110:167-74. DOI:
Chen J., Ito T., Shinohara Y. 2002. Effects of cell shape on the growth of plug transplants in several vegetable crops. Environ. Control Biol. 40:157-66. DOI:
Choi W.C., Kim D.C., Ryu I.H., Kim K.U. 2002. Development of a seedling pick–up device for vegetable transplanters. Trans. A.S.A.E. 45:13. DOI:
Han C., Hu X., Zhang J., You J., Li H. 2021. Design and testing of the mechanical picking function of a high-speed seedling auto-transplanter. Artif. Intell. Agric. 5:64-71. DOI:
Han L.H., Mao H.P., Hu J.P., Kumi F. 2019. Development of a riding-type fully automatic transplanter for vegetable plug seedlings. Span. J. Agric. Res. 17:e0205. DOI:
Hwang S.J., Park J.H., Lee J.Y., Shim S.B., Nam J.S. 2020. Optimization of main link lengths of transplanting device of semi-automatic vegetable transplanter. Agronomy. 10. DOI:
Ibrahim B., Ismail W.I.W., Ishal W. 2014. Development of system rice intensification (SRI) paddy transplanter. Asian J. Agric. Sci. 6:48–53. DOI:
Jin X., Li D., Ma H., Ji J., Zhao K., Pang J. 2018. Development of single row automatic transplanting device for potted vegetable seedlings. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 11:67-75. DOI:
Keller T., Sandin M., Colombi T., Horn R., Or D. 2019. Historical increase in agricultural machinery weights enhanced soil stress levels and adversely affected soil functioning. Soil Till. Res. 194:104293. DOI:
Khadatkar A., Mathur S.M., Gaikwad B.B. 2018. Automation in transplanting: A smart way of vegetable cultivation. Curr. Sci. 115:1884-92. DOI:
Koch H.J., Heuer H., Tomanová O., Märländer B. 2008. Cumulative effect of annually repeated passes of heavy agricultural machinery on soil structural properties and sugar beet yield under two tillage systems. Soil Till. Res. 101:69-77. DOI:
Kumar G.V.P., Raheman H. 2008. Vegetable transplanters for use in developing countries—a review. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 14:232-55. DOI:
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. A state of agricultural machinery in Japan, 2016. Available from: (in Japanese).
Parvin N., Coucheney E., Gren I.M., Andersson H., Elofsson K., Jarvis N., Keller T. 2022. On the relationships between the size of agricultural machinery, soil quality and net revenues for farmers and society. Soil Sec. 6:100044. DOI:
Pérez-Ruiz M., Slaughter D.C. 2021. Development of a precision 3-row synchronised transplanter. Biosyst. Eng. 206:67-78. DOI:
Rasool K., Islam M.N., Ali M., Jang B.E., Khan N.A., Chowdhury M., Chung H.J., Kwon H.J. 2020. Onion transplanting mechanisms: a review. Precis. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2.
Rutledge A.D. 1999. Experiences with conservation tillage vegetables in Tennessee. HortTechnology. 9:366-72. DOI:
Unger P.W., Kaspar, T.C. 1994. Soil compaction and root growth: a review. Agron. J. 86:759-766. DOI:
Zhang K., Tao Y., Gao K. 2014. Research advances and characteristics in transplanting mechanism of high-speed transplanter. Adv. Mater. Res. 834, 1516-22. DOI:

How to Cite

Ishizaki, S., Hirai, H., Sakagaito, T., Takeyama, T., Oido, N., Tamura, T., Mizutani, M., Watanabe, Y. and Umeda, M. (2024) “Development of a transplanter-based transplanter for vegetable seedlings cultured in a cuttable nursery mat”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 55(2). doi: 10.4081/jae.2024.1571.