Development and test of a spring-finger roller-type hot pepper picking header

Published: 19 February 2024
Abstract Views: 310
PDF: 161
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


This study developed a spring-finger roller-type hot pepper picking header to increase picking efficiency, performance, and lower harvesting costs. The picking header was mainly composed of a roller, spring-fingers, a steel frame, an upper cover plate, and transmission parts. Based on SolidWorks, a picking structure model for hot peppers was created in accordance with their mechanical properties. The movement law of the picking springfinger was analyzed based on the working principle to select appropriate motion parameters of main factors. Based on these chosen parameters, a prototype hot pepper picking header was created, and field tests were conducted to investigate the primary factors influencing the harvesting effect. The rotation speed of the roller and the travel speed of the picking machine were monitored by setting sensors. Using Design Expert, the test results were examined and optimized in accordance with a central composite design. The orthogonal test results showed that when the roller rotation speed was 215.00 r⋅min−1, and travel speed was 3.59 km⋅h−1, the hot pepper picking header had the best harvest effect. The picking rate was 98.47%, and the breakage rate was 3.87%. The hot pepper picking header with a spring-finger roller type and good picking effect were demonstrated by the field experiment.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Food and Agriculture Organization-World Health Organization (FAOWHO), 2022. Production Share of Chilies and Peppers, Dry by Region. Available online: (accessed on 08 July 2022).
Statistics Korea, 2022. Production of Chili Pepper. Available online: bmode=read&aSeq=415243 (accessed on 12 July 2022).
Wang R , Zheng Z , Lu X , et al. 2021, Design, simulation and test of roller comb type Chrysanthemum (Dendranthema morifolium Ramat) picking machine[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 187(1):106295. DOI:
Dai, X., & Liu, Z.. 2005. On current situation and its development trends of the pepper industry in China. Journal of China Capsicum. vol. 4, pp. 1-6.
Bidhan Chandra NathYo-Sang NamMd. Durrul HudaMd. Mizanur RahmanPanna AliSubrata Paul. 2017. Status and constrain for mechanization of rice harvesting system in bangladesh. Agricultural Science (English), 8(6), 492-506. DOI:
Hu S. J., 2012.Design and research of the comb -type picking device for chili pepper. Shi Hezi University, Xin Jiang.
Chen, Y.C.; Kong, L.J.; Wang, H.X., 2013. Research of mechanism and experiment of 4LZ-3.0 self-propelled pepper harvester. Appl. Mech. Mater. 419, 217–222. DOI:
Funk, P.A.; Walker, S.J., 2010. Evaluation of five green chili cultivars utilizing five different harvest mechanisms. Appl. Eng. Agric. 26, 955–964. DOI:
Funk P A, Herbon R P. 2011. A Systems Approach to Chile Harvest Mechanization[J]. International Journal of Vegetable Science, 17(3):296-309. DOI:
Wall, M. M., Walker, S., Wall, A. D., 2003). Yield and quality of machine harvested red chili peppers. American Society for Horticultural Science (2), 1-5. DOI:
Stanly N. M., Jayan P. R., Malkani P., et al., 2020, Design, development and evaluation of pepper harvester. J. Agri Search. 7, 82–85.
Kang, K.S., Park, H.S., Park, S.J., 2016. Study on optimal working conditions for picking head of self-Propelled pepper harvester by factorial test. J. Biosyst. Eng. 41, 12–20. DOI:
Kim, T.H., Kim, D.C.; Cho, Y., 2020. Performance comparison and evaluation of two small chili pepper harvester prototypes that attach to walking cultivators. Appl. Sci., 10, 2570. DOI:
Nam, J.S., Byun, J.H., Kim, T.H., et al. 2018, Measurement of mechanical and physical properties of pepper for particle behavior analysis. J. Biosyst. Eng. 43, 173–184.Nam, J.S., Kang, Y.S., Kim, S.B., Factorial experiment for drum-type secondary separating part of self-propelled pepper harvester. J. Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 42, 242–250.
Shin, S.Y., Kim, M.H., Cho, Y. et al., 2021. Performance testing and evaluation of drum-type stem separation device for pepper harvester. Appl. Sci. 11, 9225. DOI:
Qin, X., Lei, J., Chen, Y., 2012. Design and research on key components of a novel self-propelled chile pepper harvester. Appl. Mech. Mater. 468, 794–797. DOI:
Lei, J., Qin, X., Chen, Y. 2015, Design and analysis on key components of a novel chili pepper harvester’s picking device. Open Mech. Eng. J. 9, 540–545. DOI:
Duan Y., 2014. Damage mechanism and experimental study of mechanical harvesting peppers. Shi Hezi University, Xin Jiang. 10-50.
Srikanth V., Rajesh G. K., Kothakota A., et al. 2020, Modeling and optimization of developed cocoa beans extractor parameters using box behnken design and artificial neural network. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 177: 105715. DOI:
Yu Z.Y., Yang K., Hu Z.C. et al., 2023, Parameter optimization and simulation analysis of floating root cutting mechanism for garlic harvester. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. Volume 204, January 2023, 107521. DOI:

How to Cite

Song, Z., Du, C., Chen, Y., Han, D. and Wang, X. (2024) “Development and test of a spring-finger roller-type hot pepper picking header”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 55(2). doi: 10.4081/jae.2024.1562.