Green infrastructure planning based on ecosystem services multicriteria evaluation: the case of the metropolitan wine landscapes of Bordeaux

Published: 4 August 2023
Abstract Views: 538
PDF: 256
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Excessive anthropogenic activities affect landscape patterns and trigger a decrease in natural capital and the quality of life. Green infrastructures (GIs) are commonly accepted by scholars as solutions for restoring degraded areas and providing a variety of ecosystem services (ESs). On the other hand, the capacity to deliver ESs can be assumed as a relevant starting point for GIs analysis and planning. The assessment of ESs needs extensive investigation and applications to provide planners, policymakers, and institutional stakeholders with an adequate evaluation tool. The multifaceted nature of ES assessment implies the use of complex tools able to consider many concerns. In this regard, multicriteria analysis (MCA) is a very popular tool due to its capacity to intertwine a variety of issues rigorously and to support participatory and transparent decision-making in the public domain. In this study, we aim to contribute to the integration of GI design into spatial planning, starting with the assessment of the net benefit delivered to local society by a GI in the metropolitan area of Bordeaux (France). We assessed the net benefit by confronting the ESs deliverable by the GI and the cost sustained for its construction and maintenance. We applied an MCA-based method to the selection of the most efficient alternative out of three GI paths. We demonstrate that our method is useful for the assessment of cultural and regulating ESs, comparing the GI design alternatives, and considering the preference model of the stakeholders within GI planning and design.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Ala-Hulkko, Terhi, Ossi Kotavaara, Janne Alahuhta, Pekka Helle, and Jan Hjort. 2016. ‘Introducing Accessibility Analysis in Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services’. Ecological Indicators 66 (July): 416–27. DOI:
Andreucci, Maria Beatrice, Alessio Russo, and Agnieszka Olszewska-Guizzo. 2019. ‘Designing Urban Green Blue Infrastructure for Mental Health and Elderly Wellbeing’. Sustainability 11 (22): 6425. DOI:
Barbosa, Ana, Beatriz Martín, Virgilio Hermoso, Juan Arévalo-Torres, Julian Barbière, Javier Martínez-López, Sami Domisch, et al. 2019. ‘Cost-Effective Restoration and Conservation Planning in Green and Blue Infrastructure Designs. A Case Study on the Intercontinental Biosphere Reserve of the Mediterranean: Andalusia (Spain) – Morocco’. Science of The Total Environment 652 (February): 1463–73. DOI:
Bondarenko M., Kerr D., Sorichetta A., and Tatem, A.J. 2020. Census/projection-disaggregated gridded population datasets for 189 countries in 2020 using Built-Settlement Growth Model (BSGM) outputs. WorldPop, University of Southampton, UK. doi:10.5258/SOTON/WP00684
Caillon, Aurélien, and Maxime Lavoué. 2016. ‘Liste hiérarchisée des plantes exotiques envahissantes d’Aquitaine’. Conservatoire Botanique National Sud-Atlantique. 2016.
Cheng, Long, Freke Caset, Jonas De Vos, Ben Derudder, and Frank Witlox. 2019. ‘Investigating Walking Accessibility to Recreational Amenities for Elderly People in Nanjing, China’. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 76 (November): 85–99. DOI:
CNES. 2021. ‘L’agglomération bordelaise : croissance métropolitaine et étalement urbain’. geoimage. 6 January 2021.
Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES), Roy Haines-Young, and Marion Potschin. 2018. ‘Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure’ 5: 53.
De Montis, Andrea, Giovanna Calia, Valentina Puddu, and Antonio Ledda. 2021. ‘Designing Green Infrastructure Guidelines: A Methodological Approach’: In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems, 156–63. Online Streaming, --- Select a Country ---: SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications. DOI:
De Montis, Andrea, Antonio Ledda, and Giovanna Calia. 2021. ‘Integrating Green Infrastructures in Spatial Planning: A Scrutiny of Regional Tools in Sardinia, Italy’. European Planning Studies, July, 1–18. DOI:
Di Marino, Mina, Maija Tiitu, Kimmo Lapintie, Arto Viinikka, and Leena Kopperoinen. 2019. ‘Integrating Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Services in Land Use Planning. Results from Two Finnish Case Studies’. Land Use Policy 82 (March): 643–56. DOI:
Fisher, Brendan, R. Kerry Turner, and Paul Morling. 2009. ‘Defining and Classifying Ecosystem Services for Decision Making’. Ecological Economics 68 (3): 643–53. DOI:
Fondazione per lo sviluppo sostenibile, and Green City Network. 2018. ‘Le linee guida per le green city’.
García, Andrés M., Inés Santé, Xurxo Loureiro, and David Miranda. 2020a. ‘Spatial Planning of Green Infrastructure for Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change at a Regional Scale’. Sustainability 12 (24): 10525. DOI:
———. 2020b. ‘Green Infrastructure Spatial Planning Considering Ecosystem Services Assessment and Trade-off Analysis. Application at Landscape Scale in Galicia Region (NW Spain)’. Ecosystem Services 43 (June): 101115. DOI:
Ghofrani, Zahra, Victor Sposito, and Robert Faggian. 2017. ‘A Comprehensive Review of Blue-Green Infrastructure Concepts’. International Journal of Environment and Sustainability 6 (1). DOI:
González-García, Alberto, Ignacio Palomo, José A. González, Víctor García-Díez, Marina García-Llorente, and Carlos Montes. 2022. ‘Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Mapping: Can It Reconcile Urban and Protected Area Planning?’ Science of The Total Environment 803 (January): 150048. DOI:
Grădinaru, Simona R., and Anna M. Hersperger. 2019. ‘Green Infrastructure in Strategic Spatial Plans: Evidence from European Urban Regions’. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 40 (April): 17–28. DOI:
Hubbard, Susan S., Myriam Schmutz, Abdoulaye Balde, Nicola Falco, Luca Peruzzo, Baptiste Dafflon, Emmanuel Léger, and Yuxin Wu. 2021. ‘Estimation of Soil Classes and Their Relationship to Grapevine Vigor in a Bordeaux Vineyard: Advancing the Practical Joint Use of Electromagnetic Induction (EMI) and NDVI Datasets for Precision Viticulture’. Precision Agriculture 22 (4): 1353–76. DOI:
Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques. 2022a. ‘Comparateur de Territoire − Comparez Les Territoires de Votre Choix - Résultats Pour Les Communes, Départements, Régions, Intercommunalités... |’. 2022.
———. 2022b. ‘Intercommunalité-Métropole de Bordeaux Métropole (243300316) − COG |’. 2022.
Irga, P. J., J. T. Braun, A. N. J. Douglas, T. Pettit, S. Fujiwara, M. D. Burchett, and F. R. Torpy. 2017. ‘The Distribution of Green Walls and Green Roofs throughout Australia: Do Policy Instruments Influence the Frequency of Projects?’ Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 24 (May): 164–74. DOI:
Kušar, Simon. 2019. ‘Green Infrastructure as A Facilitator of Sustainable Spatial Development in Rural Areas: Experiences from The Vipava Valley (Slovenia)’. European Countryside 11 (1): 17–28. DOI:
La Notte, Alessandra La. 2017. ‘Ecosystem Services Classification: A Systems Ecology Perspective of the Cascade Framework’. Ecological Indicators, 11. DOI:
Langemeyer, Johannes, Erik Gómez-Baggethun, Dagmar Haase, Sebastian Scheuer, and Thomas Elmqvist. 2016. ‘Bridging the Gap between Ecosystem Service Assessments and Land-Use Planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)’. Environmental Science & Policy 62 (August): 45–56. DOI:
Langemeyer, Johannes, Diego Wedgwood, Timon McPhearson, Francesc Baró, Anders L. Madsen, and David N. Barton. 2020. ‘Creating Urban Green Infrastructure Where It Is Needed – A Spatial Ecosystem Service-Based Decision Analysis of Green Roofs in Barcelona’. Science of The Total Environment 707 (March): 135487. DOI:
Ledda, Antonio, Marta Kubacka, Giovanna Calia, Sylwia Bródka, Vittorio Serra, and Andrea De Montis. 2023. ‘Italy vs. Poland: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Planning System Attitudes toward Adaptation to Climate Changes and Green Infrastructures’. Sustainability 15 (3): 2536. DOI:
Li, Luyuan, Pieter Uyttenhove, and Veerle Van Eetvelde. 2020. ‘Planning Green Infrastructure to Mitigate Urban Surface Water Flooding Risk – A Methodology to Identify Priority Areas Applied in the City of Ghent’. Landscape and Urban Planning 194 (February): 103703. DOI:
Magaudda, Stefano, Romina D’Ascanio, Serena Muccitelli, and Anna Laura Palazzo. 2020. ‘“Greening” Green Infrastructure. Good Italian Practices for Enhancing Green Infrastructure through the Common Agricultural Policy’. Sustainability 12 (6): 2301. DOI:
Manuel, B. Fernández de, L. Méndez-Fernández, L. Peña, and I. Ametzaga-Arregi. 2021. ‘A New Indicator of the Effectiveness of Urban Green Infrastructure Based on Ecosystem Services Assessment’. Basic and Applied Ecology 53 (June): 12–25. DOI:
Matthews, Tony, Alex Y. Lo, and Jason A. Byrne. 2015. ‘Reconceptualizing Green Infrastructure for Climate Change Adaptation: Barriers to Adoption and Drivers for Uptake by Spatial Planners’. Landscape and Urban Planning 138 (June): 155–63. DOI:
Moyzeová, Milena. 2018. ‘Inclusion of the Public in the Natural Capital, Ecosystem Services and Green Infrastructure Assessments (Results of Structured Interviews with Stakeholders of Commune Liptovská Teplička)’. Ekológia (Bratislava) 37 (1): 42–56. DOI:
Pakzad, Parisa, and Paul Osmond. 2016. ‘Developing a Sustainability Indicator Set for Measuring Green Infrastructure Performance’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 216 (January): 68–79. DOI:
Pakzad, Parisa, Paul Osmond, and Linda Corkery. 2017. ‘Developing Key Sustainability Indicators for Assessing Green Infrastructure Performance’. Procedia Engineering 180: 146–56. DOI:
Reu Junqueira, Juliana, Silvia Serrao-Neumann, and Iain White. 2022. ‘Using Green Infrastructure as a Social Equity Approach to Reduce Flood Risks and Address Climate Change Impacts: A Comparison of Performance between Cities and Towns’. Cities 131 (December): 104051. DOI:
Ronchi, Silvia, Andrea Arcidiacono, and Laura Pogliani. 2020. ‘Integrating Green Infrastructure into Spatial Planning Regulations to Improve the Performance of Urban Ecosystems. Insights from an Italian Case Study’. Sustainable Cities and Society 53 (February): 101907. DOI:
United Nations, and Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2019. ‘World Population Prospects 2019’. World Population Prospects 2019, 2019.
Yang, Qing, Gengyuan Liu, Marco Casazza, Francesco Gonella, and Zhifeng Yang. 2021. ‘Three Dimensions of Biodiversity: New Perspectives and Methods’. Ecological Indicators 130 (November): 108099. DOI:
Zhang, S., and F. Muñoz Ramírez. 2019. ‘Assessing and Mapping Ecosystem Services to Support Urban Green Infrastructure: The Case of Barcelona, Spain’. Cities 92: 59–70. DOI:

How to Cite

Calia, G., Serra, V., Ledda, A. and De Montis, A. (2023) “Green infrastructure planning based on ecosystem services multicriteria evaluation: the case of the metropolitan wine landscapes of Bordeaux”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 54(4). doi: 10.4081/jae.2023.1531.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.