Original Articles Open access

Raw earth-based building materials: An investigation on mechanical properties of Floridia soil-based adobes

Authors

Published
28 June 2021
Section
Original Articles
DOI
10.4081/jae.2021.1154

Abstract

Raw earth, like wood and stone, is one of the oldest building materials used across the world. Nowadays, given the growing role of circular economy, researchers are ever more interested in raw earth-based building materials, because they are widely available and environmentally friendly. The use of this traditional material has positive environmental consequences, especially in traditional rural building reuse and in rural landscape preservation. In fact, raw earth is locally available and totally recyclable and, thanks to its perfect integration into the landscape, it improves site visual perception. Additives and/or chemical stabilizer agents (i.e., Portland cement) are often used in the production of raw earthbased building components in order to increase their mechanical performance and durability. This production process reduces the environmental sustainability of the base material and causes a relevant increase on the embodied energy (i.e., the total energy required for the extraction, processing, manufacturing, and delivery of building components). This research work aimed at investigating how to improve the mix-design of earth-based building materials in order to increase their mechanical properties without any addition of chemical agents. A physical stabilization was performed on an original texture soil by adding various particle sizes. Mechanical tests were carried out on five different soil mixes by changing soil composition, aggregates, and water. Specimens made with mix-design 5 offered the best results in terms of flexural and compressive strength values which were 1.65 MPa and 6.74 MPa, respectively. Mix 3 obtained the lowest linear shrinkage rate (6.04%). Since raw earth-based materials are highly sensitive to soil composition and aggregates, this study attempted to obtain a repeatable process to produce semi-industrial adobes by optimizing and controlling various natural materials (i.e., soils, aggregates, and water).

Keywords

References

  1. Achenza M., Sanna U. 2009. Il Manuale tematico della Terra Cruda, Dei Tipografia del Genio Civile, Italy.
  2. Araya-Letelier G., Concha-Riedel J., Antico F.C., Valdés C., Cáceres G. 2018. Influence of natural fiber dosage and length on adobe mixes damage-mechanical behavior. Constr. Build. Mater. 174:645-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.151
  3. Avrami E.C., Guillaud H., Hardy M. (Eds.). eds. 2008. Terra literature review: an overview of research in earthen architecture conservation. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  4. Barbari M., Monti M., Rossi G., Simonini S., Guerri F.S. 2014a. Proposal for a simple method of structural calculation for ordinary earthen buildings in rural areas. J. Food Agric. Environ. 12:1459-63.
  5. Barbari M., Monti M., Rossi G., Simonini S., Guerri F.S. 2014b. Simple methods and tools to determine the mechanical strength of adobe in rural areas. J. Food Agric. Environ. 12:904-9.
  6. Belfiore C.M., Amato C., Pezzino A., Viccaro M. 2020. An end of waste alternative for volcanic ash: A resource in the manufacture of ceramic tiles. Constr. Build. Mater. 263:120118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120118
  7. Ciancio D., Jaquin P., Walker P. 2013. Advances on the assessment of soil suitability for rammed earth. Constr. Build. Mater. 42:40-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.049
  8. Fagone M., Kloft H., Loccarini F., Ranocchiai G. 2019. Jute fabric as a reinforcement for rammed earth structures. Compos. Part B Eng. 175:107064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107064
  9. Galán-Marín C., Rivera-Gómez C., Bradley F. 2013. Ultrasonic, molecular and mechanical testing diagnostics in natural fibre reinforced, polymer-stabilized earth blocks. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2013:130582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/130582
  10. Gallipoli D., Bruno A.W., Perlot C., Mendes J. 2017. A geotechnical perspective of raw earth building. Acta Geotechn. 12:463-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0521-1
  11. Giuffrida G., Caponetto R., Cuomo M. 2019. An overview on contemporary rammed earth buildings: Technological advances in production, construction and material characterization. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 296:012018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/296/1/012018
  12. Hall M., Djerbib Y. 2004. Rammed earth sample production: Context, recommendations and consistency. Constr. Build. Mater. 18:281-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2003.11.001
  13. Houben H., Guillaud H. 2006. CRATerre: TraiteÃ…Lde Construction en Terre. EÃ…Lditions Parenthe`ses: Marseille, France.
  14. NMAC. 2003. New Mexico Earthen Building Materials Code. Construction Industries Division (CID) of the Regulation and Licensing Department (Santa Fe Ì, NM).
  15. SNZ. 1998. New Zealand Standard 4298:1998. In: Materials and Workmanship for Earth Buildings, 1998 Standards. Wellington, New Zealand.
  16. Ouellet-Plamondon C.M., Habert G. 2016. Self-compacted clay based concrete (SCCC): proof-of-concept. J. Clean. Prod. 117:160-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.048
  17. Parlato M.C.M., Porto S.M.C. 2020. Organized framework of main possible applications of sheep wool fibers in building components. Sustain. 12:761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030761
  18. Perrot A., Rangeard D., Menasria F., Guihéneuf S. 2018. Strategies for optimizing the mechanical strengths of raw earth-based mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 167:496-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.055
  19. Picuno P. 2016. Use of traditional material in farm buildings for a sustainable rural environment. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 5:451-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.05.005
  20. Statuto D., Sica C., Picuno P. 2018. Experimental development of clay bricks reinforced with agricultural by-products. Sustainable Farming-SFARM View project Mediterranean technology led incubator co-operation-MEDI-CUBE View project. Available from: http://atae.agr.hr/46th_ATAE_proceedings.pdf
  21. Türkmen İ., Ekinci E., Kantarcı F., Sarıcı T. 2017. The mechanical and physical properties of unfired earth bricks stabilized with gypsum and Elazığ Ferrochrome slag. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 6:565-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.12.003
  22. Vega P., Juan A., Ignacio Guerra M., Morán J.M., Aguado P.J., Llamas B. 2011. Mechanical characterisation of traditional adobes from the north of Spain. Constr. Build. Mater. 25: 3020-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.02.003
  23. Woyciechowski P., Narloch P.L., Cichocki D. 2017. Shrinkage characteristics of cement stabilized rammed earth, in: MATEC Web of Conferences. 117:00178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711700178

Metrics

Citations and online attention from Dimensions, Altmetric and PlumX.

PlumX Metrics

License

Copyright (c) 2021 the Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.