Soil electrical conductivity estimated by time domain reflectometry and electromagnetic induction sensors: Accounting for the different sensor observation volumes

  • Ali Saeed School of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
  • Alessandro Comegna School of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
  • Giovanna Dragonetti Land and Water Division, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute - International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies, Bari, Italy.
  • Nicola Lamaddalena Land and Water Division, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute - International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies, Bari, Italy.
  • Angelo Sommella Department of Agriculture, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
  • Antonio Coppola | antonio.coppola@unibas.it School of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.

Abstract

This paper dealt with the calibration of an EMI sensor for monitoring the time dynamics of root zone salinity under irrigation with saline water. Calibration was based on an empirical multiple regression approach largely adopted in the past and still applied in practice for its relative simplicity. Compared to the more complex inversion approaches, it requires an independent dataset of local σb measured within discrete depth intervals, to be compared to horizontal and vertical electrical conductivity (ECaH and ECaV) readings for estimating the parameters of the empirical regression equations. In this paper, we used time domain reflectometry (TDR) readings to replace direct sampling for these local σb measurements. When using this approach, there is the important issue of taking into account the effect of the different sensor observation volumes, making the readings not immediately comparable for empirical calibration. Accordingly, a classical Fourier’s filtering technique was applied to remove the high frequency part (at small spatial scale) of the original data variability, which, due to the different observation volume, was the main source of dissimilarity between the two datasets. Thus, calibration focused only on the lower frequency information, that is, the information at a spatial scale larger than the observation volume of the sensors. By this analysis, we showed and quantified the degree to which the information of the set of TDR readings came from a combination of local and larger scale heterogeneities and how they have to be manipulated for use in EMI electromagnetic induction sensor calibration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ali Saeed, School of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza
Land and Water Division
Published
2017-12-04
Section
Original Articles
Keywords:
Soil salinity, electromagnetic induction, time domain reflectometry, sensors observation volume, Fourier’s analysis.
Statistics
Abstract views: 808

PDF: 188
Appendix: 128
HTML: 202
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
Saeed, A., Comegna, A., Dragonetti, G., Lamaddalena, N., Sommella, A., & Coppola, A. (2017). Soil electrical conductivity estimated by time domain reflectometry and electromagnetic induction sensors: Accounting for the different sensor observation volumes. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 48(4), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2017.716