Original Articles
3 June 2025
Early Access
Efficient use of water in four genotypes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. walp) aiming to face water deficit
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
166
Views
97
Downloads
Authors
Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) is grown in small areas without technology and with yields not exceeding 1,000kg ha-1. Water management is paramount to address water deficit caused by rainfall variability. A complete block experimental design was implemented with two factors and four levels each, with a split plot arrangement with four repetitions to apply irrigation sheets of 2.0, 2.8, 3.6 and 4.4 mm day-1 to the LC-019, LC-005-016, LC-014-016 and CAUPICOR 50 cowpea genotypes. The research was carried out in Montería, Colombia, located at 8º 48' North Latitude and 75º 52' West Longitude. Total dry mass and leaf area variables were assessed 55 days after emergence (DAE). At the cycle end, weight of 100 seeds and yield were determined. The largest leaf area was recorded for LC-005-016 and LC-014-016 with 3,178.23 and 2,802.23 cm2 plant-1 for 4.4 mm day-1, respectively. The highest biomass was recorded for the LC-005-16 genotype, with 127.6g plant-1 for 4.4 mm day-1. Yield of genotypes increased, when increasing irrigation sheet, being CAUPICOR 50 and LC-019 the ones with the highest yield, with 2,276.62 and 2,092 kg ha-1 for 4.4 mm day-1. Similar water consumption was found between CAUPICOR 50 and LC-019 with Kc of 1.1 and LC-005-016 with LC-014-016 with Kc of 0.9. These Kc values allow us to know the consumptive use of each of these genotypes for any climatic zone by multiplying them by its evapotranspiration.
Altmetrics
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
Aramendiz Tatis, H., Espitia Camacho, M. 2017. Comportamiento agronómico de líneas promisorias de frijol caupí Vigna unguiculata L. Walp en el Valle del Sinú. Temas Agrarios. 16:9-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21897/rta.v16i2.687
Aramendiz Tatis, H., Espitia Camacho, M., Cardona Ayala, C. 2017. [Adaptabilidad y estabilidad fenotípica en cultivares de fríjol Caupí en el caribe húmedo colombiano].[Article in Spanish]. Biotecnol. Sector Agropec. Agroind. 15:14-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18684/bsaa(15).589
Bastos, E.A., Ramos, H.M.M., de Andrade, Júnior A.S., do Nascimento, F.N., Cardoso, M.J. 2012. [Parâmetros fisiológicos e produtividade de grãos verdes do feijão-caupi sob déficit hídrico].[Article in Spanish]. Water Resour. Irrig. Manag. 1:31-37.
Cardona-Ayala, C., Araméndiz-Tatis, H., Jarma-Orozco, A. 2013. [Variabilidad genética en líneas de fríjol Caupí (Vigna unguiculata L. WALP)].[Article in Spanish]. Rev. Agron. 21:7-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2013v7i2.2242
Carvalho, A., de Sousa, N., Farias, D., da Rocha-Bezerra, L., da Silva, R., Viana, M., et al. 2012. Nutritional ranking of 30 Brazilian genotypes of cowpeas including determination of antioxidant capacity and vitamins. J. Food Compos. Anal. 26:81-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2012.01.005
Chavarría-Párraga, J.E., Ramírez-Caicedo, J.C., Zambrano-Kuffó, J.I., Bravo-Ferrin, R., Párraga-Muñoz, L.E. 2020. [Artículo-Coeficiente del cultivo Vigna unguiculata L. Walp para periodos secos y lluviosos en el valle del Rio Chone].[Article in Spanish]. Rev. Agrocien. 24:29-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33936/la_tecnica.v0i24.2839
de Andrade Junior, A.S., Irene Filho, J., Ferreira, J.O.P., Ribeiro, V. Q., Bastos, E.A. 2014. [Cultivares de feijão-caupi submetidas a diferentes regimes hídricos].[Article in Spanish]. Comun. Scientae 5:187-195.
Filho, J.V., Bezerra, F.M., Cavalcante da Silva, T., Pereira, C. 2017. [Crescimento vegetativo do feijão-Caupi. Cultivado sobsalinidade e déficit hídrico].[Article in Portuguese]. Rev. Bras. Agri. Irrigada. 11:2217-2228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7127/rbai.v11n800718
Gerrano, A.S., Jansen van Rensburg, W.S., Venter, S.L., Shargie, N.G., Amelework, B.A., et al. 2019. Selection of cowpea genotypes based on grain mineral and total protein content. Acta Agr. Scand. B-S P. 69:155-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2018.1520290
Hissene, H.M., Vadez, V., Michelangeli, J.C., Halilou, O., Ndoye, I., Soltani, A., Sinclair, T. 2016. Quantifying leaf area development parameters for Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walpers]. Crop Sci. 56:3209-3217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2016.02.0132
Ishiyaku, M.F., Singh, B.B., Craufurd, P.Q. 2005. Inheritance of time to flowering in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Euphytica 142:291-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-2435-0
Junior, M.D.J., Alves, B., Cardoso, M.J., Andrade Junior, A.S. 2017. Agronomic performance of the cowpea under different irrigation depths and row spacing. Rev. Cienc. Agron. 48:774-782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20170090
Larcher W. 2006. [Ecofisiologia vegetal].[Book in Portuguese]. Ed. São Carlos, RiMa Artes e Textos.
León, J.E., Parra, V.J., Silva, J.S., Peña, R.F., Román, D.A. 2022. [Requerimientos hídricos para el cultivo de fréjol variedad Calima en Riobamba, Ecuador].[Article in Spanish]. Ingen. Hidr. Ambien. 43:25-37.
Lima, J.R.S., Antonino, A.C.D., Soares, W.A., Silva I. F. 2006. [Estimativa da evapotranspiração do feijão-caupi utilizando o modelo de Penman-Monteith].[Article in Portuguese]. Irriga 11:477-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2006v11n4p477-491
Merwad, A.R.M.A., Desoky, E.-S.M., Rady, M.M. 2018. Response of water deficit-stressed Vigna unguiculata performances to silicon, proline or methionine foliar application. Sci Hortic.-Amsterdam 228:132-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.10.008
Morales-Morales, A.E., Andueza-Noh, R.H., Márquez-Quiroz, C., Benavides-Mendoza, A., Tun-Suarez, J.M., González-Moreno, A., Alvarado-López, C.J. 2019. [Caracterización morfológica de semillas de frijol caupí (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) de la Península de Yucatán].[Article in Spanish]. Ecosist. Recur. Agropec. 6:463-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a6n18.2171
Nascimento, S.P., Bastos, E.A., Araújo, E.C., Freire Filho, F. R., Silva, E. D. 2011. [Tolerânciaao déficit hídrico emgenótipos de feijão-caupi].[Article in Portuguese]. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agr. Amb. 15:853-860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662011000800013
Ogle, W.L., Witcher, W., Barnett, O.W. 1987. Descriptors for the southern peas of South Carolina. Clemson University, South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin 659.
Oliveira, G.A., Araújo, W.F., Cruz, P.L., Silva, W.L.M., Ferreira, G.B. 2011. [Resposta do feijão-caupi as lâminas de irrigação e as doses de fósforo no cerrado de Roraima].[Article in Portuguese]. Rev. Cienc. Agron. 42:872-882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902011000400008
Oliveira, S.R.M. de Andrade Júnior, A.S., de Ribeiro, V.Q., Brito, R.R. de Carvalho, M.W. 2015. [Interação de níveis de água e densidade de plantas no crescimento e produtividade do feijão-caupi, em Teresina, PI].[Article in Portuguese]. Irriga 20:502-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2015v20n3p502
Palencia-Severiche, G., Mercado-Fernández, T., Combatt-Caballero, E. 2006. [Estudio agroclimático del departamento de Córdoba].[in Spanish]. Universidad de Córdoba, Ed. Facultad Ciencias Agrarias,
Perez-Iriarte, C., Sanchez-Delgado, M., Razuri-Ramírez, L., Enciso-Gutiérrez, A. 2021. Dosis de riego y coeficiente del cultivo (Kc) en la producción del frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) en Lima, Perú. Rev. Ingen. UC 28:349-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54139/revinguc.v28i3.44
Raven, P. 2001. [Biología Vegetal].Book in Portuguese]. Rio de Janeiro, Ed. Guanabara Koogan.
Ribeiro, RV., Santos, M.G., Machado, E.C., Oliveira R.F. 2008. Photochemical heat-shock response in common bean leaves as affected by previous water deficit. Russ. J. Plant. Phys. 55:350-358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443708030102
Santana, J., Souto, J. 2011. [Produção de serapilheira na Caatinga da região semi-árida do Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil].[Article in Portuguese]. Idesia (Arica) 29 87-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292011000200011
Silva, D.M.R., Santos, J.C.C. dos Costa, R.N., Rocha, A.O., da Lima, A.N., Santos, S.A., Silva, L.K. 2017. [Resposta do feijoeiro a lâminas de água aplicada em relação à evapotranspiração da cultura].[Article in Spanish]. Rev. Agropec. Tecn. 38:71-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25066/agrotec.v38i2.33362
Silva, G.C., Magalhães, R., Sobreira, A., Schmitz, R., Silva, L. 2016.[ Rendimento de grãos secos e componentes de produção de genótipos de feijão-caupí em cultivo irrigado e de sequeiro].[Article in Portuguese]. Rev. Agroamb. 10 342- 350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v10i4.3385
Souza, L.S.B., Moura, M.S.B., Sediyama, G.C., Silva, T.G.F. 2011. [Eficiência do uso da água das culturas do milho e do feijão-caupi sob sistemas de plantio exclusivo e consorciado no Semiárido brasileiro].[Article in Portuguese]. Bragantia 70: 715-721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052011000300030
Waters, B.M., Sankaran, R.P. 2011. Moving micronutrients from the soil to the seeds: genes and physiological processes from a biofortification perspective. Plant Sci. 180:562-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.12.003
How to Cite
“Efficient use of water in four genotypes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. walp) aiming to face water deficit” (2025) Journal of Agricultural Engineering [Preprint]. doi:10.4081/jae.2025.1801.
Copyright (c) 2025 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
