Thermo-mechanical response of rigid plastic laminates for greenhouse covering

Submitted: 12 February 2016
Accepted: 1 May 2016
Published: 29 September 2016
Abstract Views: 51943
PDF: 901
HTML: 521
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Innovation in the field of protected crops represents an argument of great applied and theoretical research attention due to constantly evolving technologies and automation for higher quality flower and vegetable production and to the corresponding environmental and economic impact. The aim of this paper is to provide an analysis of some thermomechanical properties of rigid polymeric laminates for greenhouses claddings, including innovative tests such as the thermographic ones. Four types of laminates have been analysed: two polycarbonates, a polymethylmethacrylate and a polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The tests gave interesting results on different important properties, such as radiometric properties, limit stresses, strains and ductility. Moreover, a direct comparison of infrared images and force elongation curves gave important information on the relation of the (localised or homogeneous) damage evolution, with both an applicative and theoretical implication. Finally, even if to the authors knowledge at present there are no examples of using PET for covering greenhouses, the results of this paper indicates the thermomechanical and radiometric characteristics of this material make it interesting for agricultural applications.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


How to Cite

Fuina, S., Marano, G. C., Puglisi, G., De Tommasi, D. and Scarascia-Mugnozza, G. (2016) “Thermo-mechanical response of rigid plastic laminates for greenhouse covering”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 47(3), pp. 157–163. doi: 10.4081/jae.2016.549.