Original Articles

Use of machine learning tools to estimate drying rate of apple and apricot wood discs

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 29 January 2025
Published: 4 September 2025
654
Views
789
Downloads
65
HTML

Authors

This study compares three machine learning (ML) models -artificial neural networks (ANN), recurrent neural networks (RNN), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)- for predicting the drying kinetics of wood biomass from the clearing of outdated apple and apricot orchards. The primary goal was to optimize and evaluate the performance of these models in predicting drying time and moisture content of the wood, which is crucial for improving energy efficiency in the drying process. Experiments were conducted under four temperature regimes (40°C, 50°C, 60°C, and 70°C) to simulate low- and high-temperature drying conditions. The models were trained and evaluated using statistical quality metrics such as root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error MAE, and R². Results showed that all models performed with high accuracy, but XGBoost demonstrated the best statistical performance, exhibiting the lowest MAE and RMSE values. The RNN model exhibited the highest R² values and performed well in terms of MAE and RMSE, whereas the ANN model yielded slightly lower results. Despite small differences in performance, the models showed strong predictive capabilities and can be effectively used for modeling the drying process of moist wood biomass. This research emphasizes the significance of model optimization in enhancing the accuracy of drying time predictions and minimizing energy consumption in drying processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Aghbashlo, M., Hosseinpour, S., Mujumdar, A.S. 2015. Application of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in drying technology: a comprehensive review. Dry Technol. 33:1397–1462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2015.1036288

Alsheikh, M. A., Niyato, D., Lin, S., Tan, H. P., Han, Z. 2016. Mobile big data analytics using deep learning and apache spark. IEEE Network 30:22-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2016.7474340

Arel, I., Rose, D.C., Karnowski, T.P. 2010. Deep machine learning - A new frontier in artificial intelligence research [Research Frontier]. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 5:13-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2010.938364

Bovornset, S., Wongwise, S. 2007. Drying parawood with superheated steam. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 4:215– 219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2007.215.219

Derčan, B., Lukić, T., Bubalo-Živković M., Durev, B., Stojsavljević, R., Pantelić, M. 2012. Possibility of efficient utilization of wood waste as a renewable energy resource in Serbia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16:1516e1527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.10.017

Doymaz, I. 2012. Evaluation of some thin-layer drying models of persimmon slices (Diospyros kaki L.). Energy Convers. Manag. 56:199–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.11.027

Elustondo, D., Matan, N., Langrish, T., Pang, S. 2023. Advances in wood drying research and development. Dry Technol. 41:890–914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2023.2205530

Espinoza, O., Bond, B. 2016. Vacuum drying of wood— State of the art. Curr. For. Rep. 2:223–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-016-0045-9

Eurostat. 2024. Energy consumption in households. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/SEPDF/cache/58200.pdf

Günaydına, S., Ropelewska, E., Sacilik, K., Çetin, N. 2014. Exploration of machine learning models based on the image texture of dried carrot slies for classification. J. Food Eng. 143:167–177.

Ghaderi, A., Abbasi, S., Motevali, A., Minaei, S. 2012. Comparison of mathematical models and artificial neural networks for prediction of drying kinetics of mushroom in microwave vacuum dryer. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 18:283–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ110823005G

Haykin, S. 1999.Neural networks a comprehensive introduction. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall.

IEA 2008. Energy in the Western Balkans. Paris, IEA. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-in-the-western-balkans

Ilic, M., Grubor, B., Tesic, M. 2004. The state of biomass energy in Serbia. Therm Sci. 8. 5-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI0402005I

IRENA. 2019. Global energy transformation: A roadmap to 2050 (2019 edition). Abu Dhabi, International Renewable Energy Agency.

Ji, W. 2024. Apple recognition and picking sequence planning for harvesting robot in a complex environment. J. Agric. Eng. 55:1549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2024.1549

Keskes, S., Hanini, S., Hentabli, M., Laidi, M. 2020. Artificial intelligence and mathematical modelling of the drying kinetics of pharmaceutical powder. Kem. Ind. 69:137–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15255/KUI.2019.038

Kırbaşa, I., Doğuş, Tuncerb A., Şirinb, C., Usta, H. 2019. Modeling and developing a smart interface for various drying methods of pomelo fruit (Citrus maxima) peel using machine learning approaches. Comput. Electron. Agr. 165:104928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.104928

Khan, M.I.H., Sablani, S.S., Joardder, M.U.H., Karim, M.A. 2022. Application of machine learning-based approach in food drying: opportunities and challenges. Dry Technol. 40:1051–1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2020.1853152

Lerman, P., Scheepers, G. 2023. Determination of a mass-transfer coefficient for wood drying by means of thermography. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 18:2104-2111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2023.2243473

Li, X., Ma, L., Chen, P., Xu, H., Xing, Q., Yan, J, et al. 2022. Probabilistic solar irradiance forecasting based on XGBoost. Energy Rep. 8:1087-1095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.251

Martynenko, A. 2018. Artificial intelligence: is it a good fit for drying? Dry Technol. 36:891–892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2017.1362153

Milanović, M., Komatina, M., Janković, B., et al. 2022. The kinetic study of juice industry residues drying process based on TGA-DTG experimental data. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 147:10109–10129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-022-11289-5

Morales-Reyes, J.L. 2023. Anthocyanins estimation in homogeneous bean landrace Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using probabilistic representation and convolution neural networks. J. Agric. Eng. 54:1421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2023.1421

Perić, M., Antonijević, D., Komatina, M., Bugarski, B., Rakin, M. 2020. Life cycle assessment of wood chips supply chain in Serbia. Renew. Energy. 155: 1302-1311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.026

Rajković, A., Jovanović, D., Milanović, M., Ećim-Đurić, O. 2023. Investigation of convective drying characteristics and specific energy consumption of apricot and apple tree discs. Proc. 6th Int. Symp. on Agricultural Engineering., pp. 219-24.

Ropelewska, E., Çetinb, N., Günaydınc, S. 2023. Non-destructive discrimination of vacuum-dried banana using image processing operation and machine learning approach. Food Bioprod. Process. 141:36-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2023.07.001

Ryan, K., Agrawal, P., Franklin, S. 2020. The pattern theory of self in artificial general intelligence: A theoretical framework for modeling self in biologically inspired cognitive architectures. Cogn. Syst. Res. 62:44–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.09.018

Sagi, O., Rokach, L. 2021. Approximating XGBoost with an interpretable decision tree. Inf. Sci. 572:522–542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.05.055

Salazar, M.A.G., Morini, M., Pinelli, M., Spina, P.R., Venturini, M., Finkenrath, M., Poganietz, W.R. 2014. Methodology for estimating biomass energy potential and its application to Colombia. Appl. Energy. 136:781-796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.004

Samsonovich, A.V. 2020. Socially emotional brain-inspired cognitive architecture framework for artificial intelligence. Cognit. Syst. Res. 60:57-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.12.002

Shaozhi, Z., Yu, P., Dongpo, L., Youming, Z., Guangming, C., Heng, L.A. 2016. Thermophysical study on the freeze drying of wooden archaeological artifacts. J. Cult. Heritage. 17:95–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.07.003

Simpson, W.T. 1983. Drying wood: a review – Part I. Dry Technol. 2:235-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07373938308959827

Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, 2024. Area and average number of apple and pear trees, by plantation age. Available from: https://data.stat.gov.rs/Home/Result/13050201?languageCode=en-US

Strehler, A. 2000. Technologies of wood combustion. Ecol. Eng. 16:25e40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00049-5

Tian, K., Zeng, J., Song, T., Li, Z., Li, J. 2023. Tomato leaf diseases recognition based on deep convolutional neural networks. J. Agric. Eng. 54:1432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2022.1432

Xiao, H., Pang, C., Wang, L., Bai, J., Yang, W., Gao, Z. 2010. Drying kinetics and quality of Monukka seedless grapes dried in an air-impingement jet dryer. Biosyst. Eng. 105:233-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.11.001

Yang, L., Liu, H. 2020. Effect of supercritical CO2 drying on moisture transfer and wood property of Eucalyptus urophydis. Forests 11:1115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f11101115

Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Ji, G., Phillips, P. 2014. Fruit classification using computer vision and feedforward neural network. J. Food Eng. 143:167-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.07.001

Złotek, U., Dziki, U.G., Dziki, D., Swieca, M., Nowak, R., Martinez, E. 2019. Influence of drying temperature on phenolic acids composition and antioxidant activity of sprouts and leaves of white and red quinoa. J. Chem. 7125169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7125169

How to Cite



“Use of machine learning tools to estimate drying rate of apple and apricot wood discs” (2025) Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 56(4). doi:10.4081/jae.2025.1712.