Original Articles

The design of a force feedback soft gripper for tomato harvesting

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 16 June 2020
Published: 18 March 2021
6353
Views
2533
Downloads
810
HTML

Authors

In smart farming, both artificial intelligence and robotic systems are applied in order to improve efficiency. In agriculture, for jobs such as seeding, monitoring, and harvesting, robots are widely used. When using robots to harvest fruit and vegetables, it is essential not to apply excessive force, as it may damage the harvest. In this paper, a soft robotic three-fingered gripper is presented. It was designed and analysed using the finite element method. Each finger is made of silicone rubber. The shape of the finger is designed so that it is capable of handling spherical shaped objects, such as tomatoes or oranges. When holding a tomato, the fingers apply the contact force. The fingers are actuated pneumatically and the force applied is also controlled by a micro controller. The pressure inside the air chamber of the finger is in the range of 0- 95 kPa. Force sensors are attached to the end of each finger to provide force feedback. Then, the holding force is adjusted and applied to the surface of the tomato. The gripper can successfully grasp tomatoes with a force less than the bio-yield of the tomatoes 2.57 N.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bernardi L., Hopf R., Ferrari A., Ehret A.E., Mazza E. 2017. On the large strain deformation behavior of silicone-based elastomers for biomedical applications. Polym. Test. 58:189-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.12.029

Brown E., Rodenberg N., Amend J., Mozeika A., Steltz E., Zakin M. R., Lipson H., Jaeger H.M. 2010. Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107:18809-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003250107

Hao Y., Liu Z., Liu J., Fang X., Fang B., Nie S., Guan Y., Sun F., Wang T., Wen L. 2020. A soft gripper with programmable effective length, tactile and curvature sensory feedback. Smart Mater. Struct. 29:035006.

Hayashi S., Ganno K., Ishii Y., Tanaka I. 2002. Robotic harvesting system for eggplants. JARQ. 36:163-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.36.163

Ji C., Zhang J., Yuan T. , Li W. 2014. Research on key technology of truss tomato harvesting robot in greenhouse. Appl. Mech. Mater. 442:480-86.

Jinliang G., Zhao D., Wei J., Wu X. 2010. Design and control of the open apple-picking-robot manipulator. pp 5-8 in 3rd Int. Conf. Comp. Sci. Info. Tech., Chengdu, China. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSIT.2010.5564770

Lehnert C., English A., McCool C., Tow A.W., Perez T. 2017. Autonomous sweet pepper harvesting for protected cropping systems. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. 2:872-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2017.2655622

Liu J., Li P., Li Z. 2007. A multi-sensory end-effector for spherical fruit harvesting robot. pp 258-62 in IEEE Int. Conf. Autom. Logist., Jinan, China. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAL.2007.4338567

Liu J., Li Z., Wang F., Li P., Xi N. 2013. Hand-arm coordination for a tomato harvesting robot based on commercial manipulator. pp 2716-20 in IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Biomimetics, Shenzhen, China. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2013.6739884

Monta M., Kondo N., Ting K.C. 1998. End-effectors for tomato harvesting robot. J. Artif. Intell. Rev. 12:11-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006595416751

Mosadegh B., Polygerinos P., Keplinger C., Wennstedt S., Shepherd R.F., Gupta U., Shim J., Bertoldi K., Walsh C.J., Whitesides G.M. 2014. Soft robotics: pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Adv. Funct. Mater 24:2109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201470092

Sirisomboon P., Tanaka M., Kojima T. 2012. Evaluation of tomato textural mechanical properties. J. Food Eng. 111:618-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.03.007

Truby R.L., Wehner M., Grosskopf A.K., Vogt D.M., Uzel S.G.M., Wood R.J., Lewis J.A. 2018. Soft somatosensitive actuators via embedded 3D printing. Adv. Mater. 30:1706383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201706383

van Henten E.J., Hemming J., van Tuijl B.A.J., Kornet J.G., Meuleman J., Bontsema J., van Os E.A. 2002. An autonomous robot for harvesting cucumbers in greenhouses. Auton. Rob. 13:241-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020568125418

Wang G., Yu Y., Feng Q. 2016. Design of end-effector for tomato robotic harvesting. IFAC-Papers OnLine 49:190-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.035

Wang Z., Zhu M., Kawamura S., Hirai S. 2017. Comparison of different soft grippers for lunch box packaging. Rob. Biomimet. 4:10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40638-017-0067-1

How to Cite



“The design of a force feedback soft gripper for tomato harvesting” (2021) Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 52(1). doi:10.4081/jae.2021.1090.