Soil and water bioengineering between knowledge and governance: practitioners' conceptual positioning, improvement priorities, and innovation pathways

Soil and Water Bioengineering (SWB) is an established discipline increasingly reframed within emerging policy concepts such as Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) and Green and Blue Infrastructure (GBI). However, it remains unclear how this conceptual repositioning translates into professional practice, and whether governance and institutional frameworks keep pace with practitioners’ needs. This study investigates the science-policy interface of SWB in Italy by examining how practitioners position the discipline conceptually, what barriers they encounter, and which improvement priorities and innovation pathways they identify. Data were collected through a questionnaire administered in 2024, yielding 1,428 responses classified into specialists (professionally involved in SWB, 26.54%), familiar (aware but not practicing, 50.49%), and unfamiliar respondents (no prior SWB knowledge, 22.97%). Results reveal a specialist core rooted in agriculture/forestry and geology, with familiar respondents recognizing SWB functions and expressing interest in training. While practitioners broadly situate SWB within the NBS framework – treating NBS and GBI as umbrella concepts - this conceptual alignment does not correspond to coherent intervention classification, exposing significant ambiguity at the science-practice interface. Practitioners identify improvement needs more clearly than innovation pathways: training, institutional awareness, regulatory clarity, monitoring, and vegetation management rank as priorities, whereas innovation is primarily conceived through a techno-scientific lens, encompassing materials, plant-based components, and digital tools. These findings suggest that SWB development is constrained less by technical gaps than by governance deficits, weak standardization, and insufficient long-term monitoring frameworks. The study offers actionable insights for policy actors seeking to embed nature-based practices more effectively within regulatory and institutional structures.

Agnoletti M, Errico A, Santoro A, Dani A, Preti F, 2019. Terraced landscapes and hydrogeological risk. Effects of land abandonment in Cinque Terre (Italy) during severe rainfall events. Sustainability 11:235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010235

Bellin N, Van Wesemael B, Meerkerk A, Vanacker V, Barbera GG, 2009. Abandonment of soil and water conservation structures in Mediterranean ecosystems. Catena 76:114-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.10.002

Bischetti GB, Di Fi Dio M, Florineth F, 2014. On the origin of soil bioengineering. Landscape Res 39:583-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2012.730139

Buma B, Gordon DR, Kleisner KM, Bartuska A, Bidlack A, DeFries R, et al., 2024. Expert review of the science underlying nature-based climate solutions. Nat Clim Chang 14:402-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01960-0

Capobianco V, Palau RM, Solheim A, Gisnås K, Gilbert G, Danielsson P, et al., 2024. The potential use of nature-based solutions as natural hazard mitigation measure for linear infrastructure in the Nordic Countries. Geoenviron Disasters 11:27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-024-00287-4

Castellar JAC, Popartan LA, Pueyo-Ros J, Atanasova N, Langergraber G, Säumel I, et al., 2021. Nature-based solutions in the urban context: terminology, classification and scoring for urban challenges and ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 779:146237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146237

Cecconi M, Tagarelli V, Cotecchia F, Pane V, Anselmucci F, Bertolini I, et al., 2025. Soil-vegetation-atmosphere interaction for engineering applications: Recent multi-scale and multi-disciplinary insights. Geomech Energy Environ 43:100723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2025.100723

De Silva A, Amaratunga D, Haigh R, 2022. Green and blue infrastructure as nature-based better preparedness solutions for disaster risk reduction: key policy aspects. Sustainability 14:16155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316155

European Commission, 2013. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Green Infrastructure (GI) — Enhancing Europe's Natural Capital. COM/2013/0249 final. European Commission, Brussels.

European Commission, 2015. Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities: final report of the Horizon 2020 Expert Group on "Nature-Based Solutions and Re-Naturing Cities" (Full version). European Commission, Luxembourg. Available from: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/fb117980-d5aa-46df-8edc-af367cddc202/language-en

European Commission, 2019. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - The European Green Deal. COM/2019/640 final. European Commission, Brussels.

European Commission, 2021. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Forging a climate-resilient Europe – The new EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change. COM/2021/82 final. European Commission, Brussels.

European Commission, 2020. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. COM/2020/380 final. European Commission, Brussels.

Evette A, Labonne S, Rey F, Liebault F, Jancke O, Girel J, 2009. History of bioengineering techniques for erosion control in rivers in Western Europe. Environ Manage 43:972-984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9275-y

Fang X, Li J, Ma Q, 2023. Integrating green infrastructure, ecosystem services and nature-based solutions for urban sustainability: a comprehensive literature review. Sustain Cities Soc 98:104843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104843

Gray DH, Sotir RB, 1996. Biotechnical and soil bioengineering slope stabilization: a practical guide for erosion control. A Wiley-Interscience publication. New York, Wiley.

IPCC, 2023. IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_LongerReport.pdf

IUCN, 2012. The IUCN programme 2013–2016. Available from: https://iucn.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/wcc-5th-003.pdf

Kumar P, Corada Perez K, Biswal A, Sun H, Dwivedi AK, Hama S, et al., 2025. Overlooked considerations in prescribing green and blue infrastructure solutions for urban environments. Innovation 7:101184.

Leblois S, Piton G, Buffet A, Recking A, Evette A, 2026. Riverbank stabilization with bioengineering: failure processes and design suggestions from a scaled physical model. J Hydraul Eng 152:04025047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-14369

MacDonald D, Crabtree JR, Wiesinger G, Dax T, Stamou N, Fleury P, et al., 2000. Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. J Environ Manage 59:47-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0335

Mantero G, Morresi D, Marzano R, Motta R, Mladenoff DJ, Garbarino M, 2020. The influence of land abandonment on forest disturbance regimes: a global review. Landscape Ecol 35:2723-2744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01147-w

Mosisa GB, Bedadi B, Dalle G, Tassie N, 2025. Nature-based solutions for urban climate resilience: implementation, contribution, and effectiveness. Nature-Based Solut 8:100245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100245

Nesshöver C, Assmuth T, Irvine KN, Rusch GM, Waylen KA, Delbaere B, et al., 2017. The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: an interdisciplinary perspective. Sci Total Environ 579:1215-1227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106

O’Sullivan F, Mell I, Clement S, 2020. Novel solutions or rebranded approaches: evaluating the use of nature-based solutions (NBS) in Europe. Front Sustain Cities 2:572527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.572527

Preti F, Capobianco V, Sangalli P, 2022. Soil and water bioengineering (SWB) is and has always been a nature-based solution (NBS): a reasoned comparison of terms and definitions. Ecol Eng 181:106687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106687

Preti F, Dani A, Giambastiani Y, Giachi E, 2025. Slope stability time evolution of a shallow landslide restored by soil and water bioengineering (SWBE) techniques: a case study in Northwest Tuscany (Italy). Ecol Eng 214:107570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107570

Punetha P, Samanta M, Sarkar S, 2019. Bioengineering as an effective and ecofriendly soil slope stabilization method: a review. In: Pradhan SP, Vishal V, Singh TN (Eds.), Landslides: theory, practice and modelling, Advances in natural and technological hazards research. Cham, Springer. pp. 201-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77377-3_10

Rey F, Bifulco C, Bischetti GB, Bourrier F, De Cesare G, Florineth F, et al., 2019. Soil and water bioengineering: practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration. Sci Total Environ 648:1210-1218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.217

Salter D, Howell J, Eagle S, 2020. Bioengineering for green infrastructure. Manila, Asian Development Bank.

Sangalli P, Fernandes JP, Tardío G, 2021. Soil and water bioengineering as natural-based solutions. In: Catalano C, Andreucci MB, Guarino R, Bretzel F, Leone M, Pasta S (Eds.), Urban services to ecosystems. Cham, Springer. pp. 317-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2_17

Schiechtl HM, 1980. Bioengineering for land reclamation and conservation. Edmonton, University of Alberta Press.

Seddon N, Chausson A, Berry P, Girardin CAJ, Smith A, Turner B, 2020. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philos Trans R Soc B 375:20190120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120

Seddon N, Smith A, Smith P, Key I, Chausson A, Girardin C, et al., 2021. Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change. Glob Chang Biol 27:1518-1546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15513

Sotir RB, 1990. Introduction to soil bioengineering restoration. In: Berger JJ (Ed.), Environmental restoration: science and strategies for restoring the Earth. Washington, Island Press.

Stokes A, Douglas GB, Fourcaud T, Giadrossich F, Gillies C, Hubble T, et al., 2014. Ecological mitigation of hillslope instability: ten key issues facing researchers and practitioners. Plant Soil 377:1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2044-6

Tardio G, Mickovski SB, 2023. A novel integrated design methodology for nature-based solutions and soil and water bioengineering interventions: the Tardio&Mickovski methodology. Sustainability 15:3044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043044

Tarolli P, Preti F, Romano N, 2014. Terraced landscapes: from an old best practice to a potential hazard for soil degradation due to land abandonment. Anthropocene 6:10-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2014.03.002

Trigila A, Lastoria B, Iadanza C, Bussettini M, Mariani S, D’Ascola F, et al., 2025. [Dissesto idrogeologico in Italia: pericolosità e indicatori di rischio - Edizione 2024. Rapporti No. 415/2025].[in Italian]. Rome, ISPRA Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale.

Wang J, Banzhaf E, 2018. Towards a better understanding of green infrastructure: a critical review. Ecol Indic 85:758-772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.018