Analysis of structural factors affecting the energy performance of forage harvesters: review and optimization guidelines

This structured critical review examines how structural, operational, and crop-related factors affect the energy performance of self-propelled forage harvesters. A documented literature search included journal articles, conference papers, technical reports, and DLG test reports. Power demand, specific energy, specific fuel consumption, throughput, and forage quality were compared. Particular attention is given to the theoretical length of cut (LOC) as a kinematic indicator linking feed velocity, cutterhead speed, and the number of active knives. The reviewed evidence shows that energy performance results from the combined effects of LOC, material throughput, crop properties, knife condition, roller-shredding intensity, header configuration, and engine-load control. Field-test data indicate that the reduction in specific fuel consumption with increasing LOC may reach a plateau rather than continue linearly. A conceptual framework is proposed to organize the interactions and trade-offs among energy demand, productivity, and forage quality. The framework provides a basis for selecting variables in future experimental and predictive studies of forage-harvester performance.

Al-Sammarraie MAJ, Özbek O, 2019. The effect of knife clearance on the machine performance in disc type silage machines. Selcuk J of Agric Food Sci 33:74–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2019.159

Al-Sammarraie MA, Gierz Ł, Özbek O, Kırılmaz H, 2024. Power predicting for power take-off shaft of a disc maize silage harvester using machine learning. Adv Sci Technol Res J 18:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/188666

Al-Sammarraie MAJ, Özbek O, Kırılmaz H, 2025. Power requirements for corn silage harvesters and application of precision agricultural techniques: a review. J Cent Eur Agric 26:394-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/26.2.4327

ASABE, 2011. Agricultural machinery management data. ASAE D497.7 (R2015). St. Joseph, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.

ASABE, 2012. Method of determining and expressing particle size of chopped forage materials by screening. ANSI/ASAE S424.1. St. Joseph, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.

Bochat A, Zastempowski M, 2020. Comparative study of rape straw cutting with two drum cutting assemblies. T ASABE 63:345-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.13587

Chen M, Xu G, Wei M, Li X, Wei Y, Diao P, et al., 2023. Optimization design and experiment on feeding and chopping device of silage maize harvester. Int J Agric Biol Eng 16:64-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20231603.7922

CLAAS, n.d. CEMOS Auto Performance. Accessed: 19 September 2026. Available from: https://www.claas.com/en-us/smart-farming/cemos/cemos-auto-performance

CLAAS, n.d. Forage harvesters. Accessed: 13 October 2026. Available from: https://www.claas.com/en-us/agricultural-machinery/forage-harvesters

Dai T, Sun W, Zhang D, Simionescu PA, 2025. Design, testing, and optimization of a filling-type silage crushing, shredding, and baling integrated machine. Machines 13:228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13030228

DLG TestService GmbH, 2017. John Deere forage harvester 9800. DLG Test Report 7406. Available from: https://www.dlg.org/en/tests/agricultural-technology-and-farm-inputs/test-reports/test-john-deere-forage-harvester-9800

DLG TestService GmbH, 2023. Forage harvester Jaguar 960. DLG Test Report 7437. Available from: https://www.dlg.org/en/tests/agricultural-technology-and-farm-inputs/test-reports/test-claas-forage-harvester-jaguar-960

Drewry JL, Luck BD, Willett RM, Rocha EM, Harmon JD, 2019. Predicting kernel processing score of harvested and processed corn silage via image processing techniques. Comput Electron Agric 160:144-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.03.020

Fendt, n.d. Fendt Katana 650 and 850 forage harvesters. Accessed: 13 October 2026. Available from: https://www.fendt.com/int/agricultural-machinery/forage-harvester/fendt-katana

Geng DY, Mu XD, Sun YC, Zhang YM, Li HB, Jiang HX, 2021. [Simulation and test of silage corn screw-notched sawtooth-type crushing roller].[Article in Chinese with English Abstract]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 52:134-141.

Grisso R, Kocher M, Vaughan D, 2004. Predicting tractor fuel consumption. Appl Eng Agric 20:553-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.17455

Hunt D, 2001. Farm power and machinery management. 10th Ed. Ames, Iowa State University Digital Press.

Igathinathane C, Pordesimo LO, Columbus EP, Batchelor WD, Sokhansanj S, 2009. Sieveless particle size distribution analysis of particulate materials through computer vision. Comput Electron Agric 66:147-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2009.01.005

Igathinathane C, Womac AR, Sokhansanj S, 2010. Corn stalk orientation effect on mechanical cutting. Biosyst Eng 107:97-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.07.005

Jokiniemi T, Mikkola H, Hakojärvi M, Alakukku L, 2021. Comprehensive model for predicting fuel consumption in grass silage harvesting. Agric Food Sci 30:8-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.95432

John Deere, n.d. Constituent sensing for HarvestLab 3000. Accessed: 19 September 2026. Available from: https://www.deere.com/en-us/products-and-solutions/technology-solutions/precision-agriculture-technology-and-solutions/john-deere-constituent-sensing-for-harvestlab-3000-mdm2nlbd

Johnson LM, Harrison JH, Davidson D, Mahanna WC, Shinners K, 2003. Corn silage management: Effects of hybrid, chop length, and mechanical processing on digestion and energy content. J Dairy Sci 86:208-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73601-7

Kmiecik LL, Zimmermann GG, Jasper SP, Savi D, Strapasson Neto L, Sobenko LR, 2023. Whole-plant corn silage harvesting modalities: energy efficiency and operational performance. An Acad Bras Cienc 95:e20220312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202320220312

KRONE, n.d. BiG X forage harvesters. Accessed: 13 October 2026. Available from: https://www.krone-agriculture.com/en/products/forage-harvesters/big-x-480-530-580-630

Krzyżaniak K, Kowalik I, Rybacki P, 2023. Evaluation of the operating parameters of self-propelled forage harvesters during maize silage harvest. Agric Eng 27:229-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/agriceng-2023-0017

Lisowski A, Klonowski J, Świętochowski A, Gut Z, 2016. Power requirement for processing of maize plant by forage harvester. Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Trends in Agricultural Engineering, Prague. p. 375-384.

Lisowski A, Klonowski J, Sypuła M, Chlebowski J, Kostyra K, Nowakowski T, Strużyk A, 2019. Energy consumption of biomass chopping processes in the working units of forage harvester and energy balance of methane production from selected energy plants species. Biomass Bioenergy 128:105301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105301

Luck BD, Drewry JL, Shaver RD, Willett RM, Ferraretto LF, 2020. Predicting in situ dry matter disappearance of chopped and processed corn kernels using image-analysis techniques. Appl Anim Sci 36:480-488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2020-01993

Marsh BH, 2013. A comparison of fuel usage and harvest capacity in self-propelled forage harvesters. Int J Agric Biosyst Eng 7:649-654.

Martel H, Savoie P, 2000. Sensors to measure mass-flow-rate through a forage harvester. Can Agric Eng 42:123-129.

Mertens DR, 1997. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 80:1463-1481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76075-2

Mou XD, Jiang HX, Sun YC, Xu HG, Yao YC, Geng DY, 2020. [Simulation optimization and experiment of disc-type grain crushing device of silage corn harvester].[Article in Chinese with English Abstract]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 51:S218-226.

New Holland Agriculture, 2021. FR Forage Cruiser: NutriSense NIR sensor technology. Turin, New Holland Agriculture.

Nieuwenhof P, 2003. Modeling of the energy requirements of a non-row sensitive corn header for a pull-type forage harvester. Master’s Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.

Niu K, Yang Q, Bai S, Zhou L, Chen K, Wang F, et al., 2021. Simulation analysis and experimental research on silage corn crushing and throwing device. Appl Eng Agric 37:725-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.14568

O’Dogherty M, 1982. A review of research on forage chopping. J Agric Eng Res 27:267-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(82)90068-3

Persson S, 1987. Mechanics of cutting plant material. St. Joseph, American Society of Agricultural Engineers.

Pintens DA, Shinners KJ, Friede JC, Digman MF, Kalscheur KF, 2023. Impact-shredding processing of whole-plant corn: Machine performance, physical properties, and in situ ruminant digestion. Agriculture 13:160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010160

Rasmussen CB, Moeslund TB, 2019. Maize silage kernel fragment estimation using deep learning-based object recognition in non-separated kernel/stover RGB images. Sensors 19:3506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19163506

Rasmussen CB, Moeslund TB, 2021. Anchor tuning in Faster R-CNN for measuring corn silage physical characteristics. Comput Electron Agric 188:106344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106344

Rasmussen CB, Kirk K, Moeslund TB, 2022. The challenge of data annotation in deep learning - A case study on whole plant corn silage. Sensors 22:1596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041596

Rocha EM, Drewry JL, Willett RM, Luck BD, 2022. Assessing kernel processing score of harvested corn silage in real-time using image analysis and machine learning. Comput Electron Agric 203:107415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107415

Rotz CA, Muhtar HA, 1992. Rotary power requirements for harvesting and handling equipment. Appl Eng Agric 8:751-757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.26109

Savoie P, Tremblay D, Theriault R, Vigneault C, 1989. Forage chopping energy vs. length of cut. T ASAE 32:437-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31022

Savoie P, Lemire P, Thériault R, 2002. Evaluation of five sensors to estimate mass-flow rate and moisture of grass in a forage harvester. Appl Eng Agric 18:389-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.8751

Savoie P, Audy-Dubé MA, Pilon G, Morissette R, 2014. Length distribution and other dimensional parameters of chopped forage by image analysis. T ASABE 57:1549-1555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.57.10665

Sharma D, Jain M, Lohan S K, 2021. Farm power and machinery management. 2nd Ed. New Delhi, Jain Brothers.

Shinners KJ, Jirovec AG, Shaver RD, Bal M, 2000. Processing whole-plant corn silage. Appl Eng Agric 16:323-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.5214

Srivastava AK, Goering CE, Rohrbach RP, 2006. Engineering principles of agricultural machines. St. Joseph, American Society of Agricultural Engineers.

Stout BA, 1990. Handbook of energy for world agriculture. Amsterdam, Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0745-4

Walther V, Stein D, Wild K, 2011. [Veränderung der Messerschärfe beim Feldhäcksler und deren Auswirkung auf das Messerschleifen].[Article in German]. Landtechnik 66:173-175.

Wan XY, Liao QX, Jiang YJ, Liao YT, 2021. Cattle feeding experiment and chopping device parameter determination for mechanized harvesting of forage rape crop. T ASABE 64:715-725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.14341

Wang F, Wang J, Ji Y, Zhao B, Liu Y, Jiang H, Mao W, 2023. Measurement method of feeding rate in silage harvester based on components power data. Agriculture 13:391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020391

Wang WW, Li JC, Chen LQ, Qi HJ, Liang XT, 2018. Effects of key parameters of straw chopping device on qualified rate, non-uniformity and power consumption. Int J Agric Biol Eng 11:122-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20181101.3114