Original Articles

Analysis of climate change impacts on dependable flow in Lasang River watershed using the SWAT model

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 4 June 2026
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Climate change influences streamflow availability and dependability in watersheds due to its effect on the hydrologic cycle. This study assessed the quantitative impacts of climate change on dependable flow in the Lasang River watershed in southern Philippines using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. Three climate change scenarios including the baseline conditions and moderate and extreme conditions were formulated based on CMIP6 climate projections in the Philippines. The SWAT model was adequately calibrated and validated (NSE of 0.54 to 0.56) and was subjected to sensitivity and uncertainty analyses to ensure accurate representation of the watershed's hydrological behavior. Results of model simulation and flow duration analysis showed that moderate increases in precipitation and temperature due to climate change have negligible effects on dependable flow (1.1% increase), while extreme climate change conditions would result in relatively greater impacts on the watershed's dependable flow at a 14% increase. Results suggest that the river system may remain practically normal under a moderate climate change scenario, while greater water availability and dependability could be expected from the watershed under an extreme climate change scenario, particularly during the dry season for irrigation and other purposes. However, increased streamflow may still cause seasonal variability and potential dry-season water availability constraints under future climate conditions. Results obtained in this study could be used for proper irrigation system planning, design, and management and at the same time could serve as a basis for policy formulation geared towards sustainable water resources management under changing climatic conditions in the Lasang River watershed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Abbaspour KC, 2007. Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. J Hydrol 333:413-430.
Abbaspour KC, Rouholahnejad E, Vaghefi S, Srinivasan R, Yang H, Kløve B, 2015. A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. J Hydrol 524:733-752.
Abbaspour KC, 2022. The fallacy in the use of the “best-fit” solution in hydrologic modeling. Sci Total Environ 802:149713.
Alibuyog NR, Ella VB, Reyes MR, Srinivasan R, Heatwole C, Dillaha T, 2009. Predicting the effects of land use change on runoff and sediment yield in Manupali River sub-watersheds using the SWAT model. Int Agric Eng J 18:15-25.
Alejo LA, Ella VB, 2019. Assessing the impacts of climate change on dependable flow and potential irrigable area using the SWAT model: The case of Maasin River Watershed in Laguna, Philippines. J Agric Eng 50:94.
Alejo LA, Ella VB, Saludes RB, 2021. Applicability of the Climate Hazards Group Infrared Precipitation with Stations as rainfall input for SWAT watershed modeling. Water Resour 48:925-935.
Arceo MGAS, Cruz RVO, Tiburan CL, Balatibat JB, Alibuyog NR, 2018. Modeling the hydrologic responses to land cover and climate changes of selected watersheds in the Philippines using the SWAT model. DLSU Bus Econ Rev 28:84-101.
Bleidorn MT, de Paula Pinto W, Schmidt IM, Mendonça AS, Tosta dos Reis JA, 2022. Methodological approaches for imputing missing data into monthly flow series. Interdiscip J Appl Sci 9:445-458.
Briones RU, Ella VB, Bantayan NC, 2016. Hydrologic impact evaluation of land use and land cover change in Palico Watershed, Batangas, Philippines using the SWAT model. J Environ Sci Manag 19:96-107.
Chen Q, Chen H, Zhang J, Hou Y, Shen M, Chen J, et al., 2020. Impacts of climate change and LULC change on runoff in the Jinsha River Basin. J Geogr Sci 30:85-102.
Da Silva MG, de Aguiar Netto AO, de Jesus Neves RJ, do Vasco AN, Almeida C, Faccioli GG, 2015. Sensitivity analysis and calibration of hydrological modeling of a watershed in Northeast Brazil. J Environ Prot 6:837-850.
Dapin IG, Ella VB, 2020. Simulating climate variability impacts on streamflow of the Layawan River Watershed using the SWAT model. Int Agric Eng J 29:9-23.
Das SK, Ng AWM, Perera BJC, 2013. Sensitivity analysis of the SWAT model in the Yarra River catchment. Proc Int Congr Modell Simul (MODSIM. Available from: https://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim2013/H4/das.pdf
DOST-PAGASA, 2024. CMIP6-based climate change projections in the Philippines. DOST-PAGASA, Quezon City, Philippines. Available from: https://bagong.pagasa.dost.gov.ph/climate/climate-change/dynamic-downscaling
Ficklin DL, Stewart IT, Maurer EP, 2013. Climate change impacts on streamflow and sub-basin scale hydrology in the Upper Colorado River Basin. PLoS One 8:e71297.
Getachew B, Manjunatha BR, Bhat HG, 2021. Modeling projected impacts of climate and land use/land cover changes on hydrological responses in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. J Hydrol 595:125974.
Getu ET, Nigussie TA, Aneseyee AB, Barnabas J, 2021. Land use/land cover change impact on hydrological process in the Upper Baro Basin, Ethiopia. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2021:6617541.
Goudarzi FM, Sarraf A, Ahmadi H, 2021. Calibration of SWAT and three data-driven models for monthly streamflow simulation in Maharlu Lake Basin. Water Supply 21:4219-4238.
Harmel RD, Smith DR, King KW, Slade RM, 2009. Estimating storm discharge and water quality data uncertainty: A software tool for monitoring and modeling applications. Environ Modell Softw 24:832-842.
Huerta YP, Lavado-Casimiro W, Zapana M, Peña R, 2024. Understanding spatio-temporal hydrological dynamics using SWAT: A case study in the Pativilca Basin. Hydrology 11:165.
Jaron AR, 2024. Examining the ecological consequences of sand and gravel quarry in Lasang RIS Dam, Davao del Norte. Int J Prog Res Eng Manag Sci 4:85-89.
Khadka D, Babel MS, Kamalamma AG, 2023. Assessing the impact of climate and land-use changes on the hydrologic cycle using the SWAT model in the Mun River Basin, Thailand. Water 15:3672.
Kundzewicz ZW, Krysanova V, Benestad RE, Hov Ø, Piniewski M, Otto IM, 2018. Uncertainty in climate change impacts on water resources. Environ Sci Policy 79:1-8.
Liu Y, Xu Y, Zhao Y, Long Y, 2022. Using SWAT model to assess the impacts of land use and climate changes on flood in the Upper Weihe River, China. Water 14:2098.
Mollel GR, Mulungu DMM, Nobert J, Alexander AC, 2023. Assessment of climate change impacts on hydrological processes in the Usangu catchment under CMIP6 scenarios. J Water Clim Change 14:4162-4182.
Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL, 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. T ASABE 50:885-900.
Narsimlu B, Gosain AK, Chahar BR, Singh SK, Srivastava PK, 2015. SWAT model calibration and uncertainty analysis for streamflow prediction in the Kunwari River Basin using SUFI-2. Environ Process 2:79-95.
PAGASA, 2011. Climate change in the Philippines: MDGF report. PAGASA, Philippines. Available from: https://pubfiles.pagasa.dost.gov.ph/iaas/ClimateChange_in_the_Philippines_MDGF_Report_2011.pdf
Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE, 2007. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ar4_wg2_full_report.pdf
Reyes TD, 2017. Application of the SWAT model to predict streamflow and sediment yield in the Wahig-Inabanga Watershed, Bohol, Philippines. Int J Environ Rural Dev 8-9:1-9.
Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR, 2012. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109:16083-16088.
Shi M, Shiraiwa T, 2023. Estimating future streamflow under climate and land use change conditions in northeastern Hokkaido, Japan. J Hydrol Reg Stud 50:101555.
Teuling AJ, De Badts EAG, Jansen FA, Fuchs R, Buitink J, Van Dijke AJH, et al., 2019. Climate change, reforestation, and urbanization impacts on evapotranspiration and streamflow in Europe. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 23:3631-3652.
Tilahun Ashine E, 2022. Most sensitive parameters of the SWAT hydrological model: A review. Adv Oceanogr Mar Biol 3: 4-9.
Xiang X, Ao T, Xiao Q, Li X, Zhou L, Chen Y, et al., 2022. Parameter sensitivity analysis of SWAT modeling in the Upper Heihe River Basin using four approaches. Appl Sci 12:9862.
Yan R, Cai Y, Li C, Wang X, Liu Q, 2019. Hydrological responses to climate and land use changes in a watershed of the Loess Plateau, China. Sustainability 11:1443.
Yang Z, Liu Q, 2011. Response of streamflow to climate changes in the Yellow River Basin, China. J Hydrometeorol 12:1113-1126.
Zhao F, Wu Y, Qiu L, Sun Y, Sun L, Li Q, et al., 2018. Parameter uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model in a mountain-loess transitional watershed on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Water 10:690.

CRediT authorship contribution

Grace O. Tulang, conceptualization, development of the work methodology, preparation and analysis of data, model setup, simulation, calibration, validation, original manuscript writing, review and editing. Victor B. Ella, conceptualization, supervision of the study work, reviewing and editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Supporting Agencies

Department of Science and Technology-Science Education Institute-Engineering Research and Development for Technology

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

How to Cite



“Analysis of climate change impacts on dependable flow in Lasang River watershed using the SWAT model” (2026) Journal of Agricultural Engineering [Preprint]. doi:10.4081/jae.2026.2129.