Original Articles
Early Access
https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2026.2042

Determination of ammonia concentrations on different floor types in dairy cow housing using a dynamic flux chamber

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 24 March 2026
58
Views
33
Downloads
Floor design, ammonia concentrations, dairy cattle barns, manure management

Authors

Barbara Banzhaf
barbara.banzhaf@hfwu.de
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9391-4033
Department of Agricultural Management, Nürtingen-Geislingen University of Applied Sciences, Nürtingen, Germany.
Jens Hartung
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7054-9232
Department Sustainable Agriculture and Energy Systems, University of Applied Sciences Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, Freising, Germany.

The design of floor surfaces and manure management in dairy cattle houses are crucial factors in reducing ammonia emissions. This study presents data from commercial farms in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. A total of 1445 measurements were carried out on 12 farms with a total of 19 floor types using a dynamic flux chamber. The floor types could be divided into four floor categories: slatted floors, grooved floors, transverse slope floors and paved floors. The farm-by-floor type classification is sparse, however, the installation of more than one floor type per farm allowed comparisons within and between farms. The results showed that all floor categories could achieve comparatively low ammonia concentrations under the given practical conditions, with a high degree of variability in the design of each floor type. As good manure management was standard across all farms, the time since the last manure removal results in non-significant differences in the ammonia concentrations. This suggests that the effectiveness of emission-reducing floor categories depends largely on their specific design and management. This study aimed to compare ammonia concentrations across different floor types under practical conditions using a dynamic flux chamber and to identify differences related to floor type and manure management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Benz B, Ehrmann S, Richter T, 2014. [Der Einfluss erhöhter Fressstände auf das Fressverhalten von Milchkühen].[Article in German]. Landtechnik 69:232-238.
Bittman S, Dedina M, Howard CM, Oenema O, Sutton MA, 2014. Options for ammonia mitigation: Guidance from the UNECE Task Force on reactive nitrogen, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh, UK.
Braam CR, Ketelaars JJMH, Smits MCJ, 1997. Effects of floor design and floor cleaning on ammonia emission from cubicle houses for dairy cows. Netherlands J Agric Sci 45:49-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18174/njas.v45i1.525
Calvet S, Gates RS, Zhang G, Estellés F, Ogink NWM, Pedersen S, Berckmans D, 2013. Measuring gas emissions from livestock buildings: A review on uncertainty analysis and error sources. Biosyst Eng 116:221–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.11.004
Fiedler M, Berg W, Ammon C, Loebsin C, Sanftleben P, Samer P, et al., 2013. Air velocity measurements using ultrasonic anemometers in the animal zone of a naturally ventilated dairy bar. Biosyst Eng 116:276-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.10.006
Greatorex JM, 2000. A review of methods for measuring methane, nitrous oxide and odour emissions from animal production activities. JTI- Institutetet for jordbruks-och miljoteknik, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hensen A, Groot TT, van den Bulk WCM, Vermeulen AT, Oelsen JE, Schelde K, 2006. Dairy farm CH4 and N2O emissions, from one square metre to the full farm scale. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:146–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.014
Kang S, Hong Y, Im MS, Kim S-D, Jeon E-C, 2020. Key factors in measuring ammonia emissions with dynamic flux chamber in barns. Sustainability 12:6276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156276
Mondaca MR, 2019. Ventilation systems for adult dairy cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 35:139-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2018.10.006
Pöllinger A, 2015. Potential for reducing emissions by means of dung removal systems. Abschlussbericht Emiscrap, Projekt Nr. 100129, HBLFA Raumberg-Gumpenstein.
Poteko J, Zähner M, Schrade S, 2019. Effects of housing system, floor type and temperature on ammonia and methane emissions from dairy farming: A meta-analysis. Biosyst Eng 182:16-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.03.012
Reuscher KJ, Cook NB, da Silva TE, Mondaca MR, Lutcherhand KM, Van Os JMC, 2023. Effect of different air speeds at cow resting height in freestalls on heat stress responses and resting behavior in lactating cows in Wisconsin. J Dairy Sci 106:9552-9567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-23364
Rychla A, Amon B, Hassouna M, van der Weerden T, Winiwarter W, 2023. Costs and effects of measures to reduce ammonia emissions from dairy cattle and pig production: A comparison of country-specific estimations and model calculations. J Environ Manage 344:118678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118678
Schrade S, Keck M, Hartung E, 2011. Accompanying parameters for the measurement of ammonia emissions from dairy cattle housing. Landtechnik 66:128–13.
Schrade S, Poteko J, Zeyer K, Mohn, J, Zähner M, 2017. [Planbefestigte Laufflächen mit Quergefälle und Harnsammelrinne: Erste Ergebnisse zu Ammoniak-Emissionen bei Winterbedingungen].[Article in German]. Proc. 13th International Conference on Construction, Engineering and Environment in Livestock Farming, Stuttgart-Hohenheim. pp. 370-375.
Steiner B, Keck M, Keller M, Weber K, 2012. [Vergleich des Abflussverhaltens auf planbefestigten Laufflächenbelägen in Rinderställen].[in German]. Agrarforschung Schweiz 3:258-263.
Swierstra D, Braam CR, Smits MC, 2001. Grooved floor system for cattle housing: Ammonia emission reduction and good slip resistance. Appl Eng Agric 17:85-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.1929
Takai H, Nimmermark S, Banhazi T, Norton T, Jacobson LD, Calvet S, et al., 2013. Airborne pollutant emissions from naturally ventilated buildings: Proposed research directions. Biosyst Eng 116:214-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.12.015
Van Dooren HJC, Mosquera J, 2010. Measurement of ammonia emissions from three ammonia emission reduction systems for dairy cattle using a dynamic flux chamber. Proc. XVII World Cong International Commission of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Quebec City. Accessed: Sept 1, 2025. Available from: https://edepot.wur.nl/169663
Winter T, Linke S, 2017. [Erfassung gasförmiger Emissionen vom Auslauf eines Jungviehstalles mittels aktiver Probenahmehaube]. In: Wolfrum S, et al. (eds.), Ökologischen Landbau weiterdenken: Verantwortung übernehmen, Vertrauen stärken].[Book in German]. Berlin, Verlag Dr. Köster. pp. 492-495.
Zähner M, Schrade S, 2020. [Erhöhter Fressbereich mit Fressplatzabtrennungen (Fressstände) für Milchkühe].[in German]. Bauen Rind 01.07, Agroscope Merkblatt 81.

Supporting Agencies

State of Baden-Württemberg , European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. 

How to Cite



“Determination of ammonia concentrations on different floor types in dairy cow housing using a dynamic flux chamber” (2026) Journal of Agricultural Engineering [Preprint]. doi:10.4081/jae.2026.2042.
Copyright (c) 2026 the Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.