Review Articles Open access

Fatigue life evaluation and research trend in agricultural machinery: a review

Authors

Published
17 June 2026
Section
Review Articles
DOI
10.4081/jae.2026.1928

Abstract

Agricultural machinery is constantly exposed to repeated loads under diverse operating conditions, making fatigue life evaluation essential for ensuring structural durability. This review provides a systematic review of the literature from the last decade (2015-2025), focusing key methodologies and recent advanced in fatigue life evaluation for agricultural machinery. Relevant literature was analyzed with a focus on stress and strain data acquisition, signal preprocessing techniques, repeated load classification, mean stress correction, damage accumulation models, and FEA–MBD and DEM–MBD integrated simulation approaches. This review highlights the accuracy of in-field stress and strain measurements, the appropriateness of fatigue evaluation methods under variable mean stress, the quality of load characterization, and the feasibility of simulation-coupled fatigue analysis. Furthermore, the review presents a comparison of the applicability and effectiveness of each method based on case studies. Several limitations in current research are also identified, such as inconsistency in evaluation standards, discrepancies between experimental and simulation results, and challenges in reproducing complex operating conditions. Ultimately, this comprehensive review establishes a systematic foundation for improving structural durability evaluation, early-stage design safety, and maintenance planning for agricultural machinery.

Keywords

Supporting Agencies

Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA)

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article

References

  1. Abrahám R, Majdan R, Kollarová K, Tkac Z, Hajdu S, Kubík L, et al., 2022. Fatigue analysis of spike segment of special tractor wheels in terms of design improvement for Chernozem soil. Agriculture 12:471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040471
  2. Amzallag C, Gerey JP, Robert JL, Bahuaud J, 1994. Standardization of the rainflow counting method for fatigue analysis. Int J Fatigue 16:287-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(94)90343-3
  3. ASAE EP496, 2006. Agricultural machinery management. St. Joseph, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
  4. Badr EA, Ishak J, 2021. High-cycle fatigue behavior of type 4340 steel pressurized blocks including mean stress effect. Int J Press Vessels Pip 194:104535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104535
  5. Bankapur VR, Janawade SA, 2015. Fatigue analysis of tractor trailer chassis. Int Res Technol 2:1583-1584.
  6. Boardman B, 1990. Fatigue resistance of steels. In: ASM Handbook Committee (ed.), Properties and selection: irons, steels, and high-performance alloys. Materials Park, ASM International; pp. 673-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.hb.v01.a0001038
  7. Böhm M, Glowacka K, 2020. Fatigue life estimation with mean stress effect compensation for lightweight structures - The case of GLARE 2 composite. Polymers 12:251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12020251
  8. Böhm M, Kluger K, Pochwała S, Kupina M, 2020. Application of the S-N curve mean stress correction model in terms of fatigue life estimation for random torsional loading for selected aluminum alloys. Materials 13:2985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13132985
  9. Burhan I, Kim HS, 2018. S-N curve models for composite materials characterisation: An evaluative review. J Compos Sci 2:38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs2030038
  10. Carbone A, Kiyono K, 2016. Detrending moving average algorithm: Frequency response and scaling performances. Phys Rev E 93:063309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.063309
  11. Cardei P, Constantin N, Muraru V, Persu C, Sfiru R, Vladut NV, et al., 2023. The random vibrations of the active body of the cultivators. Agriculture 13:1565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081565
  12. Ceylan H, Wang S, Kim S, Gopalakrishnan K, Khazanovich L, Dai S, 2015. Impact of farm equipment loading on low-volume concrete road structural response and performance. Balt J Road Bridge Eng 10:277-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2015.41
  13. Chen H, Yang F, Wu Z, Yang B, Huo J, 2023a. A nonlinear fatigue damage accumulation model under variable amplitude loading considering the loading sequence effect. Int J Fatigue 177:107945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107945
  14. Chen J, Jin Y, Mao Q, Xiao Y, Wu H, Chen G, 2014. Fourier hull fatigue assessment method’s proposing and software development. Sens Transducers 171:78-85.
  15. Chen W, Cao G, Yuan D, Ding Y, Zhu J, Chen X, 2023b. Study on agricultural machinery-load-testing technology and equipment based on six-dimensional force sensor. Agriculture 13:1649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091649
  16. Dhangar V, Perumal S, Kumar A, Redkar D, Mahajan A, Chakraborty A, et al., 2017. Durability analysis methodology of tractor hydraulic bell crank assembly for various agricultural operations. SAE Technical Paper 2017-26-0235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-26-0235
  17. Dowling NE, 1971. Fatigue failure predictions for complicated stress strain histories. Urbana, Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/AD0736583
  18. Dowling NE, 2009. Mean stress effects in strain-life fatigue. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 32:1004-1019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01404.x
  19. Fajri A, Prabowo AR, Muhayat N, Smaradhana DF, Bahatmaka A, 2021. Fatigue analysis of engineering structures: State of development and achievement. Proc Struct Integr 33:19-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2021.10.004
  20. Fatemi A, Yang L, 1998. Cumulative fatigue damage and life prediction theories: A survey of the state of the art for homogeneous materials. Int J Fatigue 20:9-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-9
  21. Franco RR, de Souza GFM, da Silva CH, 2018. Experimental uncertainty analysis of gear fatigue life theoretical prediction. Proc. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), Reno; pp. 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RAM.2018.8462984
  22. Glinka G, Kam JCP, 1987. Rainflow counting algorithm for very long stress histories. Int J Fatigue 9:223-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(87)90025-9
  23. Hao R, Wen Z, Xin H, Lin W, 2023. Fatigue life prediction of notched details using SWT model and LEFM-based approach. Materials 16:1942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051942
  24. He J, Wang Z, Gao B, Yu D, Ma Y, Zhong W, et al., 2024. Fatigue analysis of PTO gearboxes in paddy power chassis using measured loads. Agriculture 14:1436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091436
  25. Hectors K, De Waele W, 2021. Cumulative damage and life prediction models for high-cycle fatigue of metals: A review. Metals 11:204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020204
  26. Henriques B, Carvalho M, Tavares SMO, de Castro PMST, 2021. A comparison of safety factor values for Soderberg and DIN 743 fatigue analyses. U Porto J Eng 7:11-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-6493_007.002_0003
  27. Huang B, Wang S, Geng S, Liu X, 2021. Improved numerical model for fatigue cumulative damage of mechanical structure considering load sequence and interaction. Adv Mech Eng 13:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814021995309
  28. Huang T, Ding RC, Li YF, Zhou J, Huang HZ, 2019. A modified model for nonlinear fatigue damage accumulation of turbine disc considering the load interaction effect. Metals 9:919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/met9090919
  29. Hunt D, 2008. Farm power and machinery management. Long Grove, Waveland Press.
  30. Hwang IS, Ji SM, Im WT, Shin CS, 2025. Safety analysis of agricultural implement for mulching and soil covering. Agriculture 15:632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15060632
  31. Hwang IS, Kim JH, Im WT, Jeung HH, Nam JS, Shin CS, 2024. Analyzing safety factors and predicting fatigue life of weak points in an electrically driven, multi-purpose cultivation tractor. Agriculture 14:416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030416
  32. Islam MN, Iqbal MZ, Chowdhury M, Ali M, Shafik K, Kabir MSN, et al., 2021. Stress and fatigue analysis of picking device gears for a 2.6 kW automatic pepper transplanter. Appl Sci 11:2241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052241
  33. Jahanbakhshi A, Heidarbeigi K, 2019. Simulation and mechanical stress analysis of the lower link arm of a tractor using finite element method. J Fail Anal Preven 19:1666-1672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00763-2
  34. Jena PR, Tanti PC, 2023. Effect of farm machinery adoption on household income and food security: Evidence from a nationwide household survey in India. Front Sustain Food Syst 7:922038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.922038
  35. Joun MS, Ji SM, Chung WJ, Cho GS, Lee KH, 2022. A new general fatigue limit diagram and its application of predicting die fatigue life during cold forging. Materials 15: 2351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072351
  36. Kanayev AA, Kosanova IM, Sarsembayeva TE, Kanayev AT, Ayazbayeva AB, 2024. Assessing the durability of heavy-duty parts of soil-cutting machines with the size optimization and structure modification. Steel Transl 54:733-741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0967091224701420
  37. Khan AM, Khalil MS, Azad MM, 2025. Estimation of vibration-induced fatigue damage in a tracked vehicle suspension arm at critical locations under real-time random excitations. Machines 13:257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13040257
  38. Kim JH, Gim DH, Nam JS, 2024. Experimental structural safety analysis of front-end loader of agricultural tractor. Agriculture 14:947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14060947
  39. Kim JH, Markumningsih S, Hwang SJ, Jang MK, Kim SJ, Yang YJ, et al., 2023. Safety analysis of fastening device of agricultural by-product collector in various ground conditions. Agriculture 13:2064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112064
  40. Kim JH, Markumningsih S, Nam JS, 2022. Safety evaluation on a fastening device of an agricultural by-product collector for hard flat ground driving. Agriculture 12:1071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12071071
  41. Kim WS, Kim YJ, Baek SM, Moon SP, Lee NG, Kim YS, et al., 2020. Fatigue life simulation of tractor spiral bevel gear according to major agricultural operations. Appl Sci 10:8898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248898
  42. Kim WS, Kim YJ, Kim YS, Park SU, Lee KH, Hong DH, et al., 2021. Evaluation of the fatigue life of a tractor's transmission spiral bevel gear. J Terramech 94:13-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2020.11.005
  43. Kim YS, Lee PU, Kim WS, Kwon OW, Kim CW, Lee KH, et al., 2019. Strength analysis of a PTO (Power Take-Off) gear-train of a multi-purpose cultivator during a rotary ditching operation. Energies 12:1100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061100
  44. Koyuncu A, Gökler Mİ, Balkan T, 2012. Development of a design verification methodology including strength and fatigue life prediction for agricultural tractors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60:777-785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3590-1
  45. Kumbhar SV, Tayade RM, 2014. A case study on effect of mean stress on fatigue life. Int J Eng Dev Res 2:304-306.
  46. Kun F, Carmona HA, Andrade JS, Herrmann HJ, 2008. Universality behind Basquin's law of fatigue. Phys Rev Lett 100:094301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.094301
  47. Łagoda T, Vantadori S, Glowacka K, Kurek M, Kluger K, 2022. Using the Smith-Watson-–Topper parameter and its modifications to calculate the fatigue life of metals: The state-of-the-art. Materials 15:3481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103481
  48. Lee DH, Kim YJ, Chung SO, Choi CH, Lee KH, Shin BS, 2015. Analysis of the PTO load of a 75 kW agricultural tractor during rotary tillage and baler operation in Korean upland fields. J Terramech 60:75-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2015.06.002
  49. Lemaitre J, 1985. A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. J Eng Mater Technol 107:83.89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3225775
  50. Lepot M, Aubin JB, Clemens FH, 2017. Interpolation in time series: an introductive overview of existing methods, their performance criteria and uncertainty assessment. Water 9:796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100796
  51. Ma W, Liu T, Li W, Yang H, 2023. The role of agricultural machinery in improving green grain productivity in China: Towards trans-regional operation and low-carbon practices. Heliyon 9:e20279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20279
  52. Markumningsih S, Hwang SJ, Nam JS, 2022a. Experimental safety analysis for transplanting device of the 4-bar link type semi-automatic vegetable transplanter. Agronomy 12:1890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081890
  53. Markumningsih S, Hwang SJ, Nam JS, 2022b. Experimental safety analysis of transplanting device of the cam-type semi-automatic vegetable transplanter. J Terramech 103:19-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2022.07.001
  54. Markumningsih S, Hwang SJ, Kim JH, Jang MK, Shin CS, Nam JS, 2023. Comparison of consumed power and safety of two types of semi-automatic vegetable transplanter: Cam and four-bar link. Agriculture 13:588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030588
  55. Marshall S, Cooper JB, 2016. Quantitative Raman spectroscopy when the signal-to-noise is below the limit of quantitation due to fluorescence interference: Advantages of a moving window sequentially shifted excitation approach. Appl Spectrosc 70:1489-1501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003702816662621
  56. Mattetti M, Molari G, Sereni E, 2017. Damage evaluation of driving events for agricultural tractors. Comput Electron Agric 135:328-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.01.018
  57. Minda AA, Barbinta CI, Gillich GR, 2020. A review of interpolation methods used for frequency estimation. Rom J Acoust Vib 17:21-28.
  58. Miner MA, 1945. Cumulative damage in fatigue. J Appl Mech 12:A159-A164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4009458
  59. Moon SI, Cho IJ, Yoon D, 2011. Fatigue life evaluation of mechanical components using vibration fatigue analysis technique. J Mech Sci Technol 25:631-637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0124-6
  60. Murakami Y, Takagi T, Wada K, Matsunaga H, 2021. Essential structure of S-N curve: Prediction of fatigue life and fatigue limit of defective materials and nature of scatter. Int J Fatigue 146:106138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106138
  61. Nakhaei M, Sterba M, Foletti JM, Badih L, Behr M, 2023. Experimental analysis and numerical fatigue life prediction of 3D-printed osteosynthesis plates. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 11:1133869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1133869
  62. Nelson GC, Vanos J, Havenith G, Jay O, Ebi KL, Hijmans RJ, 2024. Global reductions in manual agricultural work capacity due to climate change. Glob Chang Biol 30:e17142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17142
  63. Okenyi V, Afazov S, Mansfield N, Siegkas P, Serjouei A, Bodaghi M, 2024. Fatigue testing approach utilising machining cutting forces and fixture design. Exp Mech 64:963-968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-024-01068-8
  64. Papuga J, Vízková I, Nesládek M, Trubelová Š, 2018. Validation data set for testing the criteria for multiaxial fatigue strength estimation. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 41:2259-2271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12822
  65. Paraforos DS, Griepentrog HW, Vougioukas SG, Kortenbruck D, 2014. Fatigue life assessment of a four-rotor swather based on rainflow cycle counting. Biosyst Eng 127:1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.08.006
  66. Paraforos DS, Griepentrog HW, Vougioukas SG, 2016. Methodology for designing accelerated structural durability tests on agricultural machinery. Biosyst Eng 149:24-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.06.004
  67. Piskorowski J, 2006. Phase-compensated time-varying Butterworth filters. Analog Integr Circuits Signal Process 47:233–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-006-5255-9
  68. Popovych P, Poberezhny L, Shevchuk O, Murovanyi I, Poberezhna L, Hrytsanchuk A, et al., 2020. Corrosion-fatigue failure of tractor trailers metal materials in aggressive environments. Koroze a Ochrana Materiálu 64:45–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/kom-2020-0007
  69. Rezaei A, Masoudi H, Zaki Dizaji H, Khorasani Ferdavani ME, 2023. Modelling, analysis, and optimisation of the rear axle of cereal combine harvester under real loads using finite elements method. J Agric Eng 54:1448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2023.1448
  70. Rychlik I, 1987. A new definition of the rainflow cycle counting method. Int J Fatigue 9:119–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(87)90054-5
  71. Sendeckyj GP, 2001. Constant life diagrams — a historical review. Int J Fatigue 23:347–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00077-3
  72. Shigley JE, Mitchell LD, Saunders H, 1985. Mechanical engineering design. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3258702
  73. Siddique MAA, Kim YJ, Baek SM, Baek SY, Han TH, Kim WS, et al., 2022. Development of the reliability assessment process of the hydraulic pump for a 78 kW tractor during major agricultural operations. Agriculture 12:1609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101609
  74. Singh P, Jitendra D, 2022. A review paper on adapting agriculture to climate change. Int J Innov Res Eng Manag 9:257–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2022.9.1.50
  75. Solazzi L, Mazzoni A, 2023. Experimental study of the fatigue life of off-highway steel wheels using the rim section test approach. Appl Sci 13:9119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169119
  76. Song D, Wang T, Zhu S, Liu Z, 2024. Extrapolation framework and characteristic analysis of load spectrum for agriculture general power machinery. Processes 12:2078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102078
  77. Sun B, Xu Z, 2021. An efficient numerical method for meso-scopic fatigue damage analysis of heterogeneous concrete. Constr Build Mater 278:122395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122395
  78. Sun L, Liu M, Wang Z, Wang C, Luo F, 2023. Research on load spectrum reconstruction method of exhaust system mounting bracket of a hybrid tractor based on MOPSO-wavelet decomposition technique. Agriculture 13:1919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101919
  79. Sun Q, Dui HN, Fan XL, 2014. A statistically consistent fatigue damage model based on Miner's rule. Int J Fatigue 54:1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.04.006
  80. Tridello A, Boursier Niutta C, Rossetto M, Berto F, Paolino DS, 2021. Statistical models for estimating the fatigue life, the stress–life relation, and the P-S–N curves of metallic materials in Very High Cycle Fatigue: A review. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 45:332–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13610
  81. Tyutrin S, 2020. Investigation of applicability of tin fatigue gauges for monitoring operational load of cultivator spring strut. Engineering for Rural Development 19:218–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev.2020.19.TF053
  82. Vlase S, Marin M, Iuliu N, 2022. Finite element method-based elastic analysis of multibody systems: A review. Mathematics 10:257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10020257
  83. Wang Y, Li D, Nie C, Gong P, Yang J, Hu Z, et al., 2023. Research progress on the wear resistance of key components in agricultural machinery. Materials 16:7646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16247646
  84. Wen C, Xie B, Song Z, Yang Z, Dong N, Han J, et al., 2021. Methodology for designing tractor accelerated structure tests for an indoor drum-type test bench. Biosyst Eng 205:1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.02.007
  85. Xian C, Zhang H, Kim YC, Zhang H, Liu Y, 2024. Programmed system for fatigue life prediction of excavator turntables based on multi-body dynamics and finite element analysis. Heliyon 10:e33126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33126
  86. Xie C, Wei W, Zhu Y, Xiao M, Chen T, 2025. Wear reduction damage mitigation and operational reliability analysis of rotary tiller knives based on the self-excited vibration theory. Comput Electr Agric 231:109991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.109991
  87. Yan X, Zhang J, Zhang J, Wu Y, Zhang J, Xu L, 2025. Methodology for compiling torque load spectra of tractor power take-off shafts based on nonlinear damage accumulation. Eng Fract Mech 314:110685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110685
  88. Yin J, Chen Z, Lv S, Wu H, Gao Y, Wu L, 2024. Design and fatigue life analysis of the rope-clamping drive mechanism in a knotter. Agriculture 14:1254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081254
  89. Yuan R, Li H, Huang HZ, Zhu SP, Gao H, 2015. A nonlinear fatigue damage accumulation model considering strength degradation and its applications to fatigue reliability analysis. Int J Damage Mech 24:646–662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789514544228
  90. Zhang B, Bai T, Wu G, Wang H, Zhu Q, Zhang G, et al., 2024. Fatigue analysis of shovel body based on tractor subsoiling operation measured data. Agriculture 14:1604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091604
  91. Zhao H, Zhai Z, Mou Y, Liu L, Lan Y, Cui H, 2022. Fatigue life prediction and reliability analysis of the forage crusher rotor. J Mech Sci Tech 36:1771–1781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-0313-5
  92. Zhou H, Yi S, Liu Y, Hu Y, Xiang Y, 2020. A fatigue life prediction method for the drive system of wind turbine using Internet of Things. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2020:9048508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9048508
  93. Zhu L, Xing B, Li X, Chen M, Jia M, 2024. Investigation study of structure real load spectra acquisition and fatigue life prediction based on the optimized efficient hinging hyperplane neural network model. Chinese J Mech Eng 37:153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-024-01124-3
  94. Zhu SP, Lei Q, Huang HZ, Yang YJ, Peng W, 2017. Mean stress effect correction in strain energy-based fatigue life prediction of metals. Int J Damage Mech 26:1219–1241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789516651920
  95. Zhunisbekov S, 1987. Experience with calculating the life of components of agricultural machines. Strength Mater 19:491–495. Zuo FJ, Huang HZ, Zhu SP, Lv Z, Gao H, 2014. Fatigue life prediction under variable amplitude loading using a non-linear damage accumulation model. Int J Damage Mech 24:767–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789514553042

Metrics

Citations and online attention from Dimensions, Altmetric and PlumX.

PlumX Metrics

License

Copyright (c) 2026 the Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.