Original Articles Open access

Precision monitoring of dry dairy cows herd: effects of environmental conditions, grazing availability and social network behavior

Authors

Published
23 January 2026
Section
Original Articles

Abstract

Access to outdoor space for dry cows is strongly influenced by environmental conditions, feed availability, and social dynamics within the barn. Understanding the interplay among these factors can support precision herd management strategies aimed at enhancing cow welfare and health. The aim of this study was to assess how environmental conditions, grazing forage availability and social dynamics influence the behavior of a dairy cow herd, based on their entry and exit from outdoor spaces monitored using the new technologies. The experiment was conducted for 154 days on a commercial dairy farm located in Mantua (Italy) with 35 Holstein cows during the dry period. The availability of outdoor forage was monitored by mowing on several test plots, while meteorological conditions were monitored using a weather station. The cows were equipped with radio frequency identification (RFID) tags to record the free access the pasture. Social interactions were monitored based on the temporal association of cow passages through the gate. To identify a leader-follower relationship, a k-means algorithm was applied to log the frequency of time intervals between successive passages. Correlation analysis results between the number of daily passes and rumination and feeding time revealed strong correlations, with R² values of 0.71*** and 0.65***, respectively. Temperature-humidity index (THI) was the most influent parameter, while RH, solar radiation  and rainfall appeared to have less significant impact. However, wind speed during the day and humidity at night has greatest negative influence. The dynamic social network analysis (SNA) showed that the 42% of passages were associated with a leader-follower relationship and three key findings were observed: i) the cow established preferential relationships with specific members of the herd independently of animal's status (heifer or dry), age, and number of calvings; ii) some individuals are more skilled at establishing connections, while others tend to be more solitary; iii) when a significant bond is lost, it is often replaced by another.

 

References

  1. Arnott, G., Ferris, C., O’Connell, N. 2017. Welfare of dairy cows in continuously housed and pasture-based production systems. Animal 11:261-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116001336
  2. Bargo, F., Muller, L.D., Kolver, E. S., Delahoy, J.E. 2003. Invited review: production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73581-4
  3. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M. 2009. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Social Media 3:361-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
  4. Boyland, N.K., Mlynski, D.T., James, R., Brent, L.J., Croft, D.P. 2016. The social network structure of a dynamic group of dairy cows: From individual to group level patterns. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 174:1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.11.016
  5. Charlton, G.L., Rutter, S.M. 2017. The behaviour of housed dairy cattle with and without pasture access: A review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci 192:2–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.05.015
  6. C Charlton, G.L., Rutter, S.M., East, M., Sinclair, L.A. 2011. Effects of providing total mixed rations indoors and on pasture on the behavior of lactating dairy cattle and their preference to be indoors or on pasture. J. Dairy Sci. 94:3875–3884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4172
  7. Daros, R.R., Weary, D.M., von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. 2022. Invited review: Risk factors for transition period disease in intensive grazing and housed dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 105:4734-4748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-20649
  8. Di Grigoli, A., Ponte, M., Bonanno, A., Maniaci, G., Alabiso, M. 202). Effects of grazing season on physico-chemical characteristics and fatty acids of nutritional interest of Caciocavallo Palermitano cheese. Animals 12:544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12050544
  9. Fadul-Pacheco, L., Liou, M., Reinemann, D.J., Cabrera, V.E. 2021. A preliminary investigation of social network analysis applied to dairy cow behavior in automatic milking system environments. Animals 11:1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051229
  10. Foris, B., Haas, H.-G., Langbein, J., Melzer, N. 2021. Familiarity influences social networks in dairy cows after regrouping. J. Dairy Sci. 104:3485–3494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18896
  11. Foris, B., Zebunke, M., Langbein, J., Melzer, N. 2019. Comprehensive analysis of affiliative and agonistic social networks in lactating dairy cattle groups. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 210:60–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.10.016
  12. Gutmann, A.K., Špinka, M., Winckler, C. 2015. Long-term familiarity creates preferred social partners in dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 169:1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.05.007
  13. Gygax, L., Neisen, G., Wechsler, B. 2010. Socio‐spatial relationships in dairy cows. Ethology 116: 10–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01708.x
  14. Hernandez-Mendo, O., Von Keyserlingk, M., Veira, D., Weary, D. 2007. Effects of pasture on lameness in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1209-1214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71608-9
  15. Krause, J., James, R., Croft, D. 2010. Personality in the context of social networks. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365:4099-4106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0216
  16. Lanza, M., Ponte, M., Pipi, M., Bonanno, A., Di Grigoli, A., Avondo, M., Tumino, S. 2025. Milk performance and grazing behaviour of Cinisara cows supplemented with low-and high-polyphenols faba bean varieties. Animals 15:335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15030335
  17. Legrand, A., Von Keyserlingk, M., Weary, D. 2009. Preference and usage of pasture versus free-stall housing by lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 92:3651-3658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1733
  18. Leso, L., Becciolini, V., Rossi, G., Camiciottoli, S., Barbari, M. 2021. Validation of a commercial collar-based sensor for monitoring eating and ruminating behaviour of dairy cows. Animals (Basel) 11:2852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102852
  19. Leso, L., Andrade, R.R., Bambi, G., Becciolini, V., Barbari, M. 2023. Free-choice pasture access for dry cows: Effects on health, behavior, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 106:7954–7964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-23107
  20. Lovarelli, D., Bovo, M., Giannone, C., Santolini, E., Tassinari, P., Guarino, M. 2024. Reducing life cycle environmental impacts of milk production through precision livestock farming. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 51:303–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.09.021
  21. Marumo, J.L., Fisher, D.N., Lusseau, D., Mackie, M., Speakman, J.R., Hambly, C. 2022. Social associations in lactating dairy cows housed in a robotic milking system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 249:105589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105589
  22. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1976. Livestock hot weather stress. Regional Operations Manual Letter C-31–76. Kansas City, U.S .Dep. Commerce, Natl. Oceanic and Atmospheric, Weather Service Central Region.
  23. Nogues, E., Weary, D.M., von Keyserlingk, M.A. 2024. Effect of social relationships on dairy cows’ decision to move to and from an outdoor area. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 272:106200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106200
  24. Reinhardt, V., Reinhardt, A. 1981. Cohesive relationships in a cattle herd (Bos indicus). Behaviour 77:121-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853981X00194
  25. Rocha, L.E., Terenius, O., Veissier, I., Meunier, B., Nielsen, P.P. 2020. Persistence of sociality in group dynamics of dairy cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 223:104921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104921
  26. Sato, S. 1982. Leadership during actual grazing in a small herd of cattle. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8:53-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(82)90132-8

Metrics

Citations and online attention from Dimensions, Altmetric and PlumX.